The Rudolf Steiner Archive

Notes by Mathilde Scholl

The esoteric disciple has only one condition to fulfill when entering the school, namely that he applies his reason, his intellectuality, fully to the teachings he receives, that he asks himself when listening to the teachings: Is it reasonable for me to go this way? That he recognizes and grasps with his reason and mind what is given to him. This is absolutely necessary if the esoteric work we have to do on ourselves is to have the right effect. Only under this condition can our esoteric work bear the right fruit. The school, on the other hand, has to fulfill the condition that everything that flows through it comes only from the great teachers whom we call the Masters of Wisdom and of the Harmony of Feelings. What purpose do they serve in these esoteric schools? A small group of people are to be educated, who are to be endowed with the knowledge of the development of the world and of humanity, and who bring with them the right attitude for the great spiritual truths that lie behind world events. These truths they should then let flow into the development of humanity, for the benefit of the same. How is it that this spiritual movement has emerged just now? This is based on important events in the spiritual worlds, for everything on earth is only a reflection of them. We have seen that great spiritual hierarchies carry out the commands of the Godhead and direct the destinies of humanity. Eight centuries before our era it was necessary to prepare the Mystery of Golgotha from one side, to send hindering forces into the evolvement, and the hosts of a leader, who in occultism is called Mammon, were released for this purpose. They increasingly obscured man's consciousness of his connection with divinity. The old clairvoyance was lost to men and the science and philosophy of Occidental civilization blossomed. The old Oriental philosophy still has its origins in the old clairvoyance, while Greek philosophy grows entirely out of the material. Thales' saying, “All things come from water,” was gradually interpreted in a purely material sense. The spiritual aspect of water was forgotten. But even in these times of darkness, great teachers were active who reminded people of their spiritual origin. But suppose a man of that time had no opportunity whatever to listen to the teachings of a Buddha, a Zarathustra, and so on, what would have become of such a man after death? You know that the life between two incarnations is subject to change just as is the historical life in the physical.

Of course, the darkening of human consciousness had only occurred gradually, as everything only occurs gradually in evolution. These spirits of Mammon had only gradually been able to assert their influence and each time the son was less clairvoyant than the father, the grandfather even more clairvoyant and so on. When a person died whose consciousness of the Divine was completely dark, he took this darkness with him and had to work his way out of this cloud very gradually, by passing from hand to hand, so to speak, figuratively speaking, up the line of his ancestors to the great-grandfather who still had the full, old clairvoyance. In this way the cloud gradually lifted for him. Of course, this took a lot of time, and it could happen that such a person no longer met his ancestor because he had since incarnated again, and so he had to return to a new incarnation in an immature state. This path was called the 'Fathers' Way' or 'Pitri (Fathers) Yana' in Eastern wisdom. But whoever took up the teachings of a Zarathustra, a Buddha, followed a great teacher, was received over there by his hand and the teacher shortened the Pitriyana for him, parted the cloud for him and led him to his divine origin. In Eastern wisdom, this path was called the “Devayana” (path of the gods). In the time of deepest darkness, the Mystery of Golgotha shines forth as the Light. The esoteric disciples know or should know that with the moment the blood flowed from the wounds, the Christ began the journey into the spiritual world, that he appeared in Devachan. That was the spiritual reflection of the physical events below. What the Mystery of Golgotha has brought to Humanity is there; but the understanding of it can only dawn very gradually in human souls; indeed, even today it cannot dawn universally. The guiding power in human destinies had, at the time of the Mystery of Golgotha, passed from the hands of Michael to Oriphiel, who is one of the leaders serving the hosts of Mammon and who has to hold up the obstacles and hindrances to development.

Michael replaced Gabriel, who returned in the 16th century after four other archangels had followed Oriphiel, and took up the reigns again. Gabriel is in charge of human births, which is why he is the one who, for example, announces the birth of John the Baptist. In the 16th century, he prepared the human brain, the forehead, by selecting births in such a way that an organ developed in it that cannot be discovered by the means of material science, but which makes today's brain appear different from that of a person from the 13th or 14th century, for example.

Since the 16th century, the human brain has clearly changed in a way that is perceptible to the clairvoyant, with the purpose of enabling people to gradually learn to understand Christianity in its full meaning.

We have seen that during the 4th to 14th centuries, copies of the etheric and astral bodies of Christ were given to personalities who, in this way, kept the spirit of true Christianity alive. Augustine, who had received an impression of the etheric body, arrived after many aberrations at the mystical realizations that bear so much similarity to our theosophical teachings. The division of man into seven parts, for example, was a well-known fact to him, even though he had different terms for it. All those gifted with the etheric or astral body were characterized by deep humility because they were aware that the great truths they proclaimed came to them like revelations, like a grace, that they could not understand them with their ego. When such cosmic events occur, such as the bestowal of an etheric or astral body of Christ to a human being, they are usually accompanied by natural phenomena that we are inclined to interpret as coincidence, but which are in fact deeply connected with the spiritual events. To cite just one example, when Thomas Aquinas received an astral body of Christ as a young child, a bolt of lightning struck and killed Thomas's baby sister, who was lying in a cradle in the same room, but made the boy's astral body resilient enough to absorb the higher astral body.

Through the preparation of the people in the 16th century by Gabriel to develop a new organ in the forebrain, it has become possible that in the last third of the 19th century, after Gabriel had again ceded the government to Michael, what we call theosophy could flow in from the great masters of wisdom and the harmony of sensations, to gradually bring to humanity the meaning of the mystery of Golgotha in all its effects. When man now passes through the gate of death, each individual can find his great master, who allows himself to be found by every person living in the physical.

No place or date given, memoranda by Elisabeth Vreede

In the Gospel of Matthew, we are told how the three Magi come from the East to offer their incense, gold and myrrh to the newborn child Jesus, the reborn Zarathustra. They pay homage to their re-embodied Master, who has worked in his various incarnations in the three previous cultural epochs. They are, as it were, the keepers of the ancient treasures of wisdom from the ancient Indian, ancient Persian and Egyptian-Babylonian epochs. And by laying these at the feet of the Christ Child in the symbolic form of incense, gold and myrrh, they point out, as it were, how that which has been effective as cultural seeds in these periods of time can only be saved for humanity if it is permeated by the power of Christ, which will one day inspire this child. They themselves will not live to experience the resurrection of the wisdom treasures of their cultural epochs. “They returned to their own country by another way”.

But we can ask ourselves: Where do these three wise men go later, what actually becomes of their wisdom? And we must remember that the cultures that arise and pass away here on earth contain a germ within them that can be fertilized by the Christ impulse and that will come to renewed bloom in the periods of time that follow the mystery of Golgotha. What the three Magi from the Orient sacrificed to the Christ Child as cultural seeds will be awakened by the Christ; it contains the forces that can truly permeate these three later cultural periods with the Christ impulse. The third post-Atlantean epoch will be resurrected by the Christ in all that it contains as wisdom, so that it can fertilize our fifth epoch. The second age, that of Zarathustra, is resurrected so that in the sixth post-Atlantean age there can be a true understanding of the Christ. And the first, the ancient Indian age, experiences its resurrection in the seventh post-Atlantean age with the help of the power of the Christ.

And in every case, the Christ must resurrect a particular personality, a human soul who, through her destiny, is called to be the special bearer of this cultural seed from ancient times, and who is at the same time the soul who can ensure that what the Christ has brought as gifts to humanity is also continued, that the understanding of the Christ and His mission can also be taught to humanity in the appropriate way in later times.

We will consider these resurrections in turn.

Firstly: In the Gospel of Luke (chapter 7), the resurrection of the young man of Nain is described in moving words. Every word of this story is significant, pointing out how the youth of Nain lived through the entire third post-Atlantean epoch, the Egyptian-Chaldean culture, as it developed under the influence of the forces that were then active in the human soul.

The youth at Nain in the Gospel of Luke is none other than the youth at Sais; the difference between the spiritual environment of the third and fourth cultural epochs is even hidden in the names.

He is reborn, he grows up as the youth of Nain, he is again a “son of the widow”, again he dies in his youth. And the Christ Jesus is approaching as the dead is carried out of the city gate. And “many of the city” were with his mother; it is the crowd of Egyptian initiates. They are all dead, and they are burying a dead man. “And when the Lord saw him, he had compassion on him.” He had compassion on the mother, who stands there as Isis, who was the sister and wife of Osiris. And he said, “Young man, I say to you, arise!” “And the dead man sat up and began to speak, and he gave him to his mother.” She has descended upon the earth, the former Isis; her powers can now be experienced on the earth itself. The son is given back to the mother; it is now up to him to fully reconnect with her. “And those standing by praised God and said, ‘A great prophet has risen among us’. For in the youth of Nain, the Christ Jesus had planted a seed through the kind of initiation that this resurrection represents, which could only come to fruition in his next incarnation.

A great prophet, a mighty teacher of religion, has become of the youth of Nain! In the third century A.D., Mani or Manes, the founder of Manichaeism, first appeared in Babylonia. A peculiar legend tells the following about him.

Scythianos and Therebinthus or Buddha were his predecessors. The latter was the disciple of the former. After Scythianos' violent death, he fled with his books to Babylonia. He also fares badly; only an old widow takes on his teachings. She inherits his books and leaves them to her foster son, who is twelve years old and whom she adopted as a seven-year-old slave boy. This man, who can also be called a “son of the widow,” appears at the age of 24 as Manes, the founder of Manichaeism.

His teaching contained a summary of all the wisdom of the ancient religions, illuminated by a Christian gnosis that made it possible for the followers of the Babylonian-Egyptian wisdom of the stars, the religion of the ancient Persians, and even the Buddhists of India to become imbued with an understanding of the Christ impulse in this form.

This soul, which had previously lived in the youth of Nain, had been initiated by the Christ in this way for later times, when that which was contained in Manichaeism and which had not fully developed, will be realized for the benefit of the peoples of the ancient Orient, this soul, in its incarnation as Manes, has worked in preparation for its actual later mission: to bring about the true harmony of all religions.

In order to do this, it had to be reborn as the soul that has a very special relationship to the Christ Impulse. Once again, everything that had emerged from this soul in that incarnation as Manes, in the form of old and new knowledge, had to be submerged, as it were. As a “pure fool” he had to face the external knowledge of the world and the working of the Christ Impulse in the depths of his soul. He is reborn as Parsifal, the son of Herzeleide, the tragic figure abandoned by her husband. As the son of this widow, he too now leaves his mother. He goes out into the world. After many wanderings, he is chosen to become the guardian of the Holy Grail. And the continuation of the Parzival saga tells us how he again goes to the East, how he finds his brothers in the members of the dark races, and how the blessings of the Holy Grail will one day come to them too. Thus, in his life as Parzival, he prepared himself to later become a new teacher of Christianity, whose task it will be to increasingly permeate Christianity with the teachings of karma and reincarnation when the time is ripe.

Secondly: the second post-Atlantean era is that of Zarathustra. It has a special relationship to the Christ because of this. For Zarathustra pointed to the sun god, Ahura Mazdao, who approached the earth and who was none other than the future Christ. And in his entire mission, Zarathustra was a forerunner for the Christ in that he taught to appreciate and work the earth, not to flee from evil forces but to overcome them and thereby redeem them. Thus the Ego of Zarathustra, the highest developed human Ego, could be chosen to dwell for eighteen years in the sheaths that were to receive the Christ. His Ego left the sheaths shortly before the baptism of St. John in the Jordan. Thus he was not embodied in the flesh when the Christ walked on earth. He himself incarnated soon after leaving the three shells of the Nathanic Jesus; his ego united with the etheric body of the Solomonic Jesus, which had been taken into the spiritual world by the mother of the Nathanic Jesus at the time of his death.

Thus, Christ Jesus could not resurrect Zarathustra as the appointed representative of the second post-Atlantean age. However, another individuality was embodied on earth at that time, as it were vicariously, whose development and most significant mission for humanity ran in a remarkable parallel to that of Zarathustra. This was Lazarus, the reborn Hiram Abiff, the most significant of Cain's sons, who had also worked on the earth mission of the human ego, as Zarathustra had done in ancient Persia. He becomes “ill”, “dies” and is laid in the tomb. The Christ Jesus learns of his illness and speaks to his disciples of the death of Lazarus. “Then Thomas, who was called the Twin, said to his fellow disciples, ‘Let us go with him so that we may die with him’ (John 11:16).”

In this resurrection, which is to take place with Lazarus, the souls that belong to the second post-Atlantean era are represented like the “people from the city” at the resurrection of the young man of Nain the third post-Atlantean era - represented by Thomas, the “twin”. For the second post-Atlantean period was the period of the twins. His otherwise completely meaningless words testify that the second post-Atlantean period is ready to be awakened by the Christ. That which lived as the cultural germ in the ancient Persian epoch did not die. It is not about the resurrection of a dead person, but about the initiation of a living being. That is the great difference between the story of this resurrection and the other two. Therefore, the Christ Jesus says: “I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, even though he die, yet shall he live.”

And the Christ Jesus comes to the tomb where Lazarus, who was believed to be dead, has been laid, and He speaks the sacramental words before all the people: “Lazarus, come forth!”—And the deceased came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes, and his face covered with a sweat cloth. And the Christ Jesus speaks the words that hint, as it were, that from this hour on this initiate will begin to work. “Dissolve him and let him go.”

He is not a youth like the youth at Nain, he is a man in full possession of his mental faculties. And the resurrected Lazarus becomes the scribe of the Gospel of John. He is the one who stands at the cross and to whom Christ Jesus speaks from the cross, pointing to the mother Sophia-Maria: “Behold, this is your mother!” Thus, once again, his peculiar representative relationship to the ego of Zarathustra is manifested, who, as the Solomonic Jesus child, was really born as the son of this mother.

With this power within him, he can work even before the sixth post-Atlantean age; already in the fifth cultural age, he prepares the sixth, the one that will show the deepest understanding of the Christ impulse, the one that will best understand the Gospel of John.

(Among the twelve apostles, Lazarus-John himself is, as it were, represented by another. John, the brother of James and son of Zebedee, is not an apostle in the strict sense. James and John are, as it were, one; among the more intimate disciples of Christ Jesus, they represent the power of the mind or emotional soul, which has a dual function in man but is nevertheless a unity. That is why they are called “sons of thunder,” for thunder is macrocosmically the same as thought in the human microcosm. But when Lazarus becomes John, he takes the place of one of the sons of Zebedee, and as such he is the one who lay at Jesus' breast at the Last Supper.

Thirdly, when Jesus the Christ walked the Earth, only the degenerate descendants of the third post-Atlantean cultural epoch remained. The second post-Atlantean epoch had almost completely disappeared as a cultural force, with only a few followers of the often-degenerate Zarathustra religion scattered here and there. But the first, the ancient Indian cultural epoch, the oldest and most spiritual, had its descendants both at the time of Christ Jesus and still in ours, even if the culture had become sick and frail from materialism. It is the age that will rise last of all, that must wait the longest.

And in a mysterious way, this resurrection is told to us in the story of the raising of Jairus' twelve-year-old daughter and the preceding healing of the woman who had had the blood-gland for twelve years.

The girl is close to death, but Christ Jesus is supposed to heal her. But the woman is also alive, whose illness began at the birth of this girl. The blood, the life, is flowing out of her. She is what has become of the once-thriving spiritual culture of ancient India, what could not be cured by the doctors, for no method of yoga, no Vedanta philosophy, in all its sublimity, could save Indian culture from destruction.

It is karmically connected with the girl who is twelve years old, that is, the development of the etheric body is almost complete. The ancient Indian cultural period was the time of the development of the etheric body. What was placed as a germ in this etheric body in ancient Indian culture is to be awakened and preserved for the last, seventh age.

But this awakening can only take place after the woman has been healed. She comes up to Christ from behind, from the crowd (Luke 8:44), touches the hem of his garment and is healed, for “your faith has made you well” (Mark 5:34). She is healed because she had faith in the spirit embodied in the flesh on earth. And when she is healed of the haemorrhage, through her voluntary act of touching the robe of Christ Jesus, that which was once a living force in her and which is now dying, indeed is already considered dead, can be resurrected: It is the daughter of Jairus, a “chief of the school”, because the first cultural period was that of the Brahmins, the priests. A large crowd is around the dead girl, “weeping and wailing”; they are again the relatives of the first post-Atlantic age, mourning what is gone. Matthew mentions the pipers (9:23) playing at the dead girl; Krishna also played the flute and the people followed this sound.

But Christ Jesus expels everyone. A great mystery will be accomplished, for the resurrection of the first age, with its development of the etheric body, has to do with deep secrets of human nature. He takes only Peter, John, James, the father and mother of the child. Thus, together with Christ Jesus and the child itself, there were seven persons: the three soul powers, the three spirit powers and the Christ as the cosmic ego. Thus, the age of the ancient holy Rishis was reflected in these seven persons. Just as the Rishis could only work when they were together in sevens, so the girl could only be raised when the number seven of forces was present. And she is healed and Christ Jesus says they should give her food. For before, the ancient Indian culture did not need to eat, she received her knowledge directly from the spiritual world through the wonderful development of the etheric body. But this nourishment has run out for her. From now on she is to eat from what her surroundings can give her. “And the Christ Jesus strictly forbade them that no one should know.” A commandment that obviously cannot be understood in a physical, real sense. But the secrets that took place with this awakening were to remain unknown and hidden for a long time.

Besides these three resurrections of the three cultural periods preceding the age of Christ Jesus, there are some more remarkable stories in the Gospels that can be linked to the integration of the Christ impulse into the development of humanity.

Fourthly: In the Gospel of John (ch. 4, 47-54) it is told of the son of the royal centurion, that is, of the Roman, who was fatally ill. In him, the fourth post-Atlantic age, the Greco-Roman age, is wasting away. And the Christ heals him at the request of the father, because the father has believed even without “signs and wonders”. The son is not raised, he did not die, because the fourth age was still alive at the time of Christ Jesus, it is only sick and can only be healed through faith. For only in the form of faith could the Greco-Roman era absorb the power of Christ.

Five: Immediately after this story in the Gospel of John, there follows the account of the healing of the sick man at Bethesda, the pool with five porches. These indicate the fifth post-Atlantic period, with all the forces of the preceding cultural periods that live in it. The people who are lying ill there do not have the right relationship to the spiritual world; they have become too deeply enslaved to matter. From time to time an angel descends who touches the water: a new revelation from the spiritual worlds heals those who are closest to it, but it no longer helps those who come later. And so there was a person who had waited for 38 years without getting to the water in time. 38 = 2 x 19, and nineteen years is the time after which the sun, moon and earth are again in the same relationship to each other, or in other words, the time in which the thinking, feeling and willing of man have passed through all possible shades in their relationship to each other. Thus nineteen years stands for one incarnation, and thirty-eight years indicates the two incarnations which on the average man has experienced since the appearance of Christ Jesus and which brings us up to our time, when a new Christ-revelation from the spiritual world will take place. The Christ does not heal this sick man by letting him into the water when the angel descends, but He speaks to him the words: “Rise, take up thy bed and walk!” That is, He strengthens in the man that power which can overcome sickness. But the man did not know who had healed him, “for the Christ Jesus had fled because there were so many people in the place.” (John 5:13). The Christ had indeed worked in him, but the man did not know about it in his conscious mind. That is how it has been all the time since the Mystery of Golgotha until our days. But after that, “Jesus found him in the temple and the man went and proclaimed that it was Jesus who had made him whole.”

Now he knew that the word is true, which the Christ Jesus spoke to the Jews: “My Father is still working and I am also working.” And again, the Christ says, “The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God; and those who hear will live.” This hour is now upon us, the hour when the Christ will assume the office of judge over the dead and become Lord of Karma. Thus this account of the healing of the sick man at Bethesda points to our time in many ways.

Sixth: A parable is mysteriously woven into the Gospel of Luke, which points to the spiritual conditions of the sixth post-Atlantic period. We have seen that this period, which signifies the resurrection of the second post-Atlantean period, is prepared by Christ Jesus raising Lazarus. And in the Gospel of Luke, immediately after speaking of good and evil, of “serving God and serving mammon,” Christ Jesus tells a parable (ch. 16). He says: There was a rich man and also a poor man named Lazarus. The latter is doing badly on earth, but after his death he enters Abraham's bosom, while the rich man, who lived in abundance, goes to hell.

Thus, in the sixth cultural period, good is separated from evil and that which indicates the true circumstances takes place in the spiritual world. The name of the poor man from the parable points to the connection with Lazarus in the Gospel of John. And the fact that we are dealing with the sixth post-Atlantic cultural period is expressed in the parable of the rich man when he says, “I still have five brothers,” who are then all unconverted. They are the part of humanity that has not yet received the Christ within them in the sixth period and must therefore fall prey to evil.

Seven: The seventh cultural period is no longer mentioned in particular, since this is already indicated in the relationship that exists between the woman with the issue of blood and the twelve-year-old girl. The woman has already been healed when the girl is raised; one cannot happen without the other.

In this and similar ways the Gospel writers have woven the historical course of human development into their writings. ¹⁴

• 14. See also the lecture Munich, August 31, 1909; and on Manes and his teachings, the lectures Berlin, November 11, 1904 and April 19, 1917.

About Master Jesus and Christian Rosenkreutz

In answer to a question about the God-friend of the Oberland, Rudolf Steiner replied that he was the Master Jesus, who had been incarnated in every century since the Mystery of Golgotha. When asked if he was also incarnated now, the answer was: he is currently in the Carpathians and Rudolf Steiner indicated that he was in contact with him in a purely spiritual way.

(Reported by Friedrich Rittelmeyer without further details of the time)

In answer to a question about the significance of the meeting of twelve high-ranking Friends of God with the very elderly Friend of God from the Oberland at Easter 1380, as described in the last letter of the Friend of God, Rudolf Steiner replied: “You see, there you have the transition to Rosicrucianism. It is the same thing that Goethe pointed to in his poem “The Secrets”. Since then, Christian Rosenkreutz has been the leading being in Western intellectual life. He has since been incarnated in every century, just like the Master Jesus, the friend of God from the Oberland. Both take turns in every century and the Master Jesus has also been working in the sense of Christian Rosenkreutz since then.

(Reported by Wilhelm Rath from his conversation with Rudolf Steiner in Stuttgart, October 16, 1922)

When asked whether the Friend of God from the Oberland was Christian Rosenkreutz, Rudolf Steiner replied: No! But Christian Rosenkreutz was in the circle of 12 Friends of God, of whose secret meetings the Friend of God from the Oberland reported. - To the further question: Was the friend of God Zarathustra, Rudolf Steiner replied: Yes.

(Reported from conversations between the Christian Community pastors W. Klein and Emil Bock with Rudolf Steiner in February 1924) Master Jesus was always incarnated with breaks of no more than 12 years. (Reported by Emmy von Gummppenberg without further details)

In answer to the question: Is the disciple John mentioned in the first three gospels the same as Lazarus? Rudolf Steiner replied: The author of the Gospel of John is Lazarus. He is only called John like many people of his time. What does John mean back then!

Question: Is Lazarus the same person who is called the son of Zebedee? Counter-question: Did the sons of Zebedee even belong to the innermost circle of the twelve? To the circle of stars in which the Christ saw mirrored his being? There must be some kind of mix-up if that is what the Gospels say. Confusion should not surprise us, because the Apostles were able to exchange their bodies even under the then prevailing very different laws of the soul. The three disciples in Gethsemane were in any case part of the innermost circle of the twelve, and Lazarus also belonged to it.

(Reported from conversations between the Christian Community pastors W. Klein and Emil Bock and Rudolf Steiner in February 1924)

About Mani

The youth of Nain followed Christ as a disciple after his resurrection. He was not one of the twelve.

Question: Is he not mentioned as a disciple of Christ in the apocryphal gospels?

Answer: In his next incarnation he was Manes; the further embodiments can be recognized by legends that resemble the resurrection of Lazarus.

(Transmitted from conversations between the Christian Community pastors W. Klein and Emil Bock and Rudolf Steiner in February 1924)

Mani will not incarnate in this century; he intends to do so in the next, provided that he finds a suitable body. Conventional education offers no possibility for the development of Mani, only the Waldorf education. When the conditions are right, he will appear as a teacher of humanity and take the lead in the fields of art and religion. He will act in the power of the Grail Mysteries and guide people to decide for themselves about good and evil.

(Transmitted by Ehrenfried Pfeiffer from his conversations with Rudolf Steiner between 1919 and 1921)

The Masters of Wisdom and of the Harmony of Sensations in Rudolf Steiner's Work

Hella Wiesberger

At the first general assembly of the German Section in October 1903, Rudolf Steiner outlined his future teaching program as “occult historical research”, part of which was the teaching of the great spiritual leaders of humanity. For, according to the aspects of the great trinity of body, soul and spirit, occult historical research will show how the physical existence of humanity is determined by the great cosmic forces of nature; what role the personal element plays in history; how the universal spirit of the universe intervenes in human destinies by pouring its life into the higher self of a great human leader and thereby communicating it to all humanity:

"For this is the way this higher life takes: it flows into the higher selves of the leading spirits, and they share it with their brothers. From embodiment to embodiment, people's higher selves develop and learn more and more to make their own selves missionaries of the divine plan of the world. Through occult historical research, one will recognize how a human leader develops to the point where he can take on a divine mission. One will realize how Buddha, Zarathustra, and Christ came to their missions.“ ¹

At the next General Assembly in October 1904, the topic was taken up again by the leaders of humanity, who repeatedly pointed out that in order to understand it, a distinction had to be made between masters of the past, the present and the future.

The masters of the past, the present and the future

After such references in the lectures of October 7 and 24, 1904, this fact was presented in detail on October 28, 1904, on the grounds that although it was already known to most people, it was necessary to keep repeating that

"In the course of our fifth root race, that is, in the time from the sinking of the Atlantean race until the next root race, a highly important step will be taken in the evolution of humanity, in that, namely, out of humanity itself, the leaders of humanity, the Manus, will arise.

All the great leaders, the Manus, who have helped humanity during the earlier root races and given it great impulses, have not completed their development purely on earth, but partly on other celestial bodies, and have thus already brought with them from other worlds what they had to give to humanity in the way of great impulses for this earth. The Manus of the Lemurian and Atlantean races, as well as the Stamm-Manu of our fifth root race, are superhuman individualities who have undergone their great schooling on other planets in order to become the leaders of humanity.

In contrast, during our fifth root race, highly developed individuals are emerging within our own humanity who, from the sixth root race onwards, will be able to become the leaders of humanity. In particular, the main leader of the sixth root race will be a human being like us, only one of the most advanced - indeed, the most advanced of all human beings. He will be an entity that began its development at the time when, in the middle of the Lemurian race, human incarnation began at all. This entity will have always been a human being among humans, only able to progress faster, and will have gone through all stages of human development. This will be the basic character of the Manu of the sixth root race. Such entities must pass through the most varied initiations, must have been initiated repeatedly.

Therefore, the fifth root race has always had initiated people since its inception, people who were initiated in that direction, so to speak, that they could go their own voluntary way. This was not the case during the entire Lemurian period and also during the entire Atlantean period. Those who helped humanity, who governed and directed it, who were statesmen and leaders of great religious communities, were under the influence of higher beings. During the Lemurian and Atlantean races, they were directly dependent on those higher beings who had undergone their development on other planets. It was only in the fifth root race that humanity was released. There we have initiates who, although they are connected with the higher entities, are not given such far-reaching advice that they are fully developed, but the initiates of the fifth root race are given more and more freedom in the details. In general, directives are given, not only to the initiates, but also to those who are inspired by them. They are given impulses, but in such a way that it is their own spirituality from which they have to carry out the things.” (Berlin, October 28, 1904)

A few months after this account, it is emphasized once again that in the fifth root race - the post-Atlantean period - the human leaders and masters are to emerge from the human race itself:

"Now, one who has passed through all phases of humanity more quickly becomes a master and rises to become a leader of humanity.” (Berlin, May 5, 1905)

Such people will then be the “true” masters of wisdom and of the harmony of feelings (Düsseldorf, March 7, 1907). The direction in which this development must be striven for can be seen from the following statement:

"Our task today is to grasp the occult in the Manas, in the purest element of thought. To grasp the spiritual in this finest distillate of the brain is the real mission of our time. To make this thought so powerful that it has something of occult power is the task set for us, in order to be able to fulfill our place in the future.” (Düsseldorf, March 7, 1907)

The same is expressed in the answer to the question once asked as to where the initiates of humanity actually are when a work like his is at stake:

“Now it is a matter of the higher truths being grasped by human thinking. If you were to meet these initiates today, you might not find in them what you are seeking. Their task lay more in earlier incarnations. Now human thinking must be spiritualized.”

²

From the twelve-, seven- and fourfold activity of the masters

Up until the separation of the first esoteric working group from the E.S.T. in 1907, Rudolf Steiner named four masters who are particularly associated with the Theosophical movement: the two masters of the East, Kuthumi and Morya, and the two masters of the West, Christian Rosenkreutz and Master Jesus. After the separation, he only spoke of the two masters of the West.

If we try to answer the question of why only four or two masters were named, while according to other statements there are twelve who form the great white lodge (Cologne, December 3, 1905), and it is also stated that there have never been more than seven initiates at the same time (Berlin, October 10, 1905), it becomes clear that that the numbers 12, 7, 4 are based on certain laws. First of all, there is a certain ratio of 12 to 7, which is found in notes from a private session with Marie von Sivers (Berlin, July 3, 1904) as follows:

"If we imagine the evolution of a planetary system, we must consider the following. Evolution takes place in such a way that two always alternate for each being: evolution and involution. Now we must imagine the seven evolving and involutionizing each other.

On the next planet, each of the rulers has to go up one level. 8 is the evolved 7. As they develop further, they develop into the others. When they arrive at 7, they cannot go any further. If 7 became 8, the process would already have happened; it is nothing but a repetition of the first, 7 on a different level. As we move up, we see that the leaders themselves change. We get 12 regents and a 13th, superfluous one. This 13th brings the whole planet into a state as it was in the beginning, only into a higher one.

We have to conclude with 12. So that in each constitution of a planetary chain we have not seven but twelve exalted leading spirits. Of these, only the first has the eighth not in action, and so on. (Our concepts belong to the rupically mental world; these entities lie beyond our concepts, so that it is not a matter of a coming forth, but of relationships - timeless). ³

These beings have been recognized as the 12 regents in the symbols, for example of the zodiac, through which the sun passes. Corresponding to the stages of the macrocosm is also the increase in consciousness of microcosmic development. Thus the number 12 has always been decisive and there have been 12 leading spirits everywhere: 12 tribes of Israel, 12 apostles, 12 knights of the Grail.

Thus, both macrocosmically and microcosmically, 12 is the sacred number that underlies everything. 7 are in action, 5 have other tasks. For the physical planet, only 7 are considered, therefore only 7 of the 12 principles of man are taught.

⁴

This description, as well as the answer to the question of May 29, 1915 (p. 201), that of the twelve leading spirits, only seven are considered for the physical plan, explains why the Theosophical Society spoke of seven masters: the Masters Kuthumi, Morya, Jesus, Christian Rosenkreutz (also known as the Count of Saint-Germain after his incarnation in the 18th century), Hilarion, Serapis and the so-called Venetian Master. These seven were understood to be the seven emanations of the Logos, and each Master was ascribed a particular mode of working according to his ray. For example, it was said of Christian Rosenkreutz that he worked through ceremonial magic as a representative of the seventh ray. Rudolf Steiner apparently rejected this, because in the lecture Berlin, June 20, 1912, there is a remark that the individuality of Christian Rosenkreutz, whom “we recognize as the leader of the occult movement into the future,” is also much misunderstood by occultists and that he will certainly never develop his authority in the world through an “outer cultus.”

However, Rudolf Steiner also spoke of a sevenfold activity of the masters, as can be seen from the account given in Berlin, July 3, 1904, and the answer to a question given on May 29, 1915. When asked about this sevenfold structure from a different quarter, he is reported as having replied: “Two work in the east, two in the west, two in the center, but one goes through”.⁵ The expression “in the center” does not refer to Central Europe, but to the Mediterranean region as the center of the world; from a global perspective, Central Europe belongs to the western world, which is why Rudolf Steiner always spoke of the two masters of the West as the ones who are decisive for Central Europe.

If we now look at the various details about the incarnations of the masters, these could appear contradictory at first glance, when on the one hand it is said that they have already been taken from the world as highly developed individuals, and on the other hand there is talk of specific incarnations, of certain masters with a special mission, even to the extent that their physical body is preserved so that death does not occur at all (see page 205). This apparent contradiction, however, only points to the manifold and complicated way in which the masters work, as well as to the degrees of mastery, as they have often been presented, for example, by Rudolf Steiner at the Boddhisattva-Buddha levels.⁶ The following two statements, for example, point to the as-well-as in the question of incarnation or non-incarnation:

“As a rule, the masters are not exactly historical personalities; they sometimes incarnate in historical personalities when it is necessary; but it is a sacrifice to a certain extent. The degree of their consciousness is no longer compatible with working for themselves. And working for themselves is already maintaining the mere name.” (Berlin, December 23, 1904)

"When the present-day leaders of humanity go about in the world in their human guise, they are not recognized in the outer exoteric world. And if we speak of the Masters of the Wisdom and of the Harmony of Feelings on the basis of spiritual science, then people would often be amazed at the simple, unpretentious humanity with which these Masters of the Wisdom and of the Harmony of Feelings come to all countries. They are present on the physical plane. But they do not give the most important teachings on the physical plane, but... on the spiritual plane. And anyone who wants to hear them and receive teachings from them must not only have access to them as to their physical, carnal body, but as to their spiritual form.

The latter statement in particular also indicates that it is advisable to exercise caution when judging and thinking further about Rudolf Steiner's statements about the incarnations of the masters, especially when the information has been handed down only inadequately and not truly authentically. This is because the masters do not work only in physical incarnation, but also through incorporation, inspiration or even astral appearance. This is indicated by the note handed down from an esoteric lesson in which the way Master Kuthumi works was discussed and it was said “that this incarnation was not in a particular personality, but that his power was at work here and there.” (Berlin, December 13, 1905, p. 213). It is obvious that these are occult phenomena that are difficult or impossible for the ordinary conscious mind to grasp, which is why the different ways in which the Mahatmas appear in H.P. Blavatsky and others in the T.S. have led to great misunderstandings. However, Rudolf Steiner did not doubt the possibility of materialization either, because Friedrich Rittelmeyer related that Rudolf Steiner once spoke to him about it:

“I vividly remember a conversation after a Berlin branch evening. Dr. Steiner told of the previous incorporations of the masters. ‘Someone enters the room. They shake hands and talk to him, he leaves the room again, but you won't notice that he leaves the house’.”

Friedrich Rittelmeyer also reports, however, that however willingly Rudolf Steiner answered his questions, he gradually distracted him in two directions: on the one hand, to spiritualize thinking, which is the most important task today, and on the other hand, to the historical context.

The Seven Great Mysteries of Life and the Masters

If, in relation to the work of the Masters in humanity, we move from the question of the ratio of twelve to seven to the question of the ratio of seven to four, we encounter an even more complicated problem. To make it clear, we must start from the letter to Günther Wagner of December 24, 1903. This letter answers the request for a more detailed explanation of what had been hinted at at the first general assembly of the German section, which had taken place in October 1903 in Berlin, namely that each of the seven races had a secret to solve. The answer to Günther Wagner begins with a sentence from the “Secret Doctrine” by H.P. Blavatsky:

“Of the seven truths or revelations, only four have been handed down to us, since we are still in the fourth round.”

This sentence comes from Blavatsky's commentary on the ten stanzas from the so-called Book of Dzyan, which, as a theosophical cosmogenesis, form the core of the “Secret Doctrine”. The rest of the content is a single commentary on them. Although Rudolf Steiner was generally very critical of H.P. Blavatsky's commentaries, he always spoke with the greatest appreciation of the Dzyan verses themselves (e.g. in the lecture Düsseldorf, April 12, 1909). He once translated the first verse from English into German himself as follows.⁷

"The Eternal Mother, clothed in her eternally invisible robes, had once again slumbered for seven eternities.

There was no time, for she lay asleep in the boundless bosom of duration.

Universal thinking was not, for there was no Ah-hi to contain it.

The seven wise (ways) to bliss were not. The great causes of suffering were not, for there was nothing that could have become entangled in them.

Darkness alone filled the infinite universe, for Father (Law, Necessity), Mother (World Substance) and Son (Lawful World, Substance, Cosmos) were as one, and the Son had not yet awakened to a new cycle and pilgrimage.

The seven sublime entities and the seven truths had ceased to be, and the universe, the son of necessity, had plunged into Paranishpanna to be exhaled by that which is and is not. Nothing (overseen) was.

The causes of existence were extinguished; the visible that was and the invisible that is remained in eternal non-being - the One Being (overseen).

Only this One Form of existence (of being) stretched endlessly, without limit, without cause, in dream-like sleep; and life wove unconsciously (blissfully) in universal space, through and through that omnipresence, which is felt only by the opened eye of the Dangma.

But where was Dangma when the A-laya of the universe was in Paramartha and the great cycle was Anupadaka?

Ah-hi = soul of the Dhyan-Choans
Paranishpanna = perfection
Dangma = seer
A-laya = soul of the world
Paramartha = accomplishment (parama = above all, artha = grasp)
Anupadaka = parentless.

H.P. Blavatsky's commentary on the sixth sentence of the first Dzyan verse, to which Rudolf Steiner refers in his letter of December 24, 1903, to Günther Wagner, reads in full: ⁸

"The ‘seven exalted rulers’ are the seven creative spirits, the Dhyan-Choans, who correspond to the Hebrew Elohim. It is the same hierarchy of archangels to which St. Michael, St. Gabriel and others belong in the Christian theogony. Only, while St. Michael, for example, is only allowed to guard the promontories and gulfs in dogmatic Latin theology, in the esoteric system the Dhyanis in turn guard one of the rounds and the great root races of our planetary chain. It is further said that they send forth their Bodhisattvas, the human representatives of the Dhyani Buddhas during each round and race. Of the “seven truths” or revelations, or rather revealed secrets, only four have been handed down to us, because we are still in the fourth round and the world has had only four Buddhas so far. This is a very complicated question and will be dealt with in detail later.

In this respect, Hindus and Buddhists say: “There are only four truths and four Vedem.” For a similar reason, Irenaeus insisted on the necessity of four Gospels. But since every new root race must receive its revelation and its revealers at the beginning of a round, the next round will bring the fifth, the following the sixth, and so on.

Of the seven truths or revelations, only four have been given to the world so far, according to H.P. Blavatsky – confirmed by Rudolf Steiner's letter of December 24, 1903 to Günther Wagner. And because every revelation needs its revelator, the world has had only four Buddhas. Whether and in what way these four Buddhas are identical with the four masters of whom Rudolf Steiner spoke within the Esoteric School must remain an open question, although he once equated the two ranks of “master” and “Buddha” (Lugano, September 17, 1911).

This immediately raises the question of the relationship between the masters and the buddhas or bodhisattvas, for Rudolf Steiner speaks of both as the greatest spiritual teachers of humanity and of both as forming a twelve-fold unity whose task it is to regulate ongoing development and to teach the significance of the Christ impulse for human development. The prerequisite for a closer study of this question is certainly that the terms Master, Buddha, and Bodhisattva are not proper names, but ranks, or dignities in the hierarchy of adeptness, which can be achieved by a human individuality with appropriate development. In the lecture Berlin, October 1, 1905, the term Bodhisattva is defined as a person who has absorbed all earthly experiences so that he knows how to utilize every thing and can thus work creatively. The wise men of the earth are not yet Bodhisattvas, because there are still things in life that even the wise cannot yet find their way around in. After a long period of working as a teacher of humanity with the rank of a Bodhisattva, he ascends to the dignity of a Buddha; he no longer needs to incarnate, but works purely spiritually for further development.

Since Rudolf Steiner calls the same individualities, for example Zarathustra, sometimes a Bodhisattva, sometimes a Master, and sometimes equates the Mastership and Buddhahood (Lugano, September 17, 1911), it may well be assumed that the same ranks are meant by the great masters of wisdom and harmony of feelings, which in the Oriental tradition of wisdom are understood as the Bodhisattva and the Buddha. But the fact that an extraordinarily complicated structure arises from the interaction of beings from the higher hierarchies, which comes into play for the realization of the concrete interrelations, has been presented by Rudolf Steiner on various occasions.⁹

An understanding of the relationship of seven to four, which H.P. Blavatsky already described as very complicated, only opens up through Rudolf Steiner's descriptions of the so-called “seven great mysteries of life”. They are none other than the “seven truths or revelations, or rather revealed mysteries”, as they were described by H.P. Blavatsky. In his letter, Rudolf Steiner also calls them the seven “esoteric root truths”. In the notes from the lecture in Berlin on October 28, 1903, it says:

"We speak of seven great mysteries. There are seven great mysteries that reveal the seven great phases of life. They are called the ‘ineffable’.” (Berlin, October 28, 1903).

In the General Assembly that took place ten days before this lecture, Rudolf Steiner had already hinted at this “in the sense of a certain occult tradition” (letter of December 24, 1903). This tradition had already been expressed in writing by the English occultist C. G. Harrison. In the book “The Transcendental Universe”, London 1894,¹⁰ From the standpoint of traditional European-Christian occultism, he critically examines the theosophy of H.P. Blavatsky's Theosophy, but admits that its “Secret Doctrine” contains very valuable information about prehistoric civilizations and religions, alludes to certain secrets “whose existence itself was not suspected” and that some of them “have been tested and found correct by a process known to occultists.” (1st lecture). In the sixth lecture, Harrison then lists the “seven great mysteries.” It is said that they apply to all levels of consciousness and cannot be explained in words, but require the application of a symbolic system, the nature of which he is not at liberty to discuss. In a footnote they are listed as follows: “1. Abyss, 2. Number, 3. Elective Affinity, 4. Birth and Death, 5. Evil, 6. The Word, 7. Bliss”.

In the very fragmentary notes from the first years of Rudolf Steiner's spiritual scientific lecture work, these seven secrets are usually only partially mentioned and the name Harrison never appears. Even in later, even more concrete descriptions, they are only partially treated, so that it is not recognizable that it is a seven-part whole. ¹¹ Only once are all seven secrets found in the same terms as in Harrison's list. This is in the Paris lectures of May/June 1906. In the lecture of June 13, 1906, it says:

"There are seven secrets of life that have never been spoken of outside the occult brotherhoods until today. Only in the present era is it possible to speak of them exoterically. They are also called the seven “inexpressible” or “unspeakable” secrets.¹²

These are the secrets:

1. The secret of the abyss.
2. The secret of the number. (It can be studied in Pythagorean philosophy).
3. The secret of alchemy. (This can be understood through the works of Paracelsus and Jakob Böhme).
4. The mystery of birth and death.¹³
5. The mystery of evil, which deals with the Apocalypse.
6. The mystery of the Word, the Logos.
7. The mystery of bliss; it is the most profoundly hidden.

The fact that these seven great mysteries or esoteric root truths are not just principal concepts that “run like leitmotifs through the entire esoteric movement” (Paris, May 5, 1913), but that they point to high spiritual beings, is clear from notes that Marie von Sivers made during a private lesson (Berlin, July 2, 1904). According to this, the seven possible relationships that the Trinity of Father, Son and Spirit enters into are to be understood as entities, and the designations given for these seven possible relational entities correspond in turn to those for the seven secrets of life. In the first lecture cycle on spiritual cosmology (October 17 to November 10, 1904), there is a fundamental discussion of how all development is determined by the three principles of consciousness, life and form, and how each of these three principles has to pass through seven stages or phases. The stages or phases of life mentioned in it correspond in turn to the seven great mysteries of life. Their realization and the soul experiences associated with them constitute the two halves of the initiation and thus the content of anthroposophy as a modern science of initiation (Dornach, December 30, 1914).

While the seven stages of consciousness and form are repeatedly encountered as the seven principles of the structure of man and the world in Rudolf Steiner's spiritual science, this is not the case to the same extent with the seven phases of cosmic life. This is apparently due to the fact that the planetary spirit keeps its life of feeling to itself (Berlin, November 3, 1904). This is presumably why the seven secrets of life are also called the “unspeakable” ones, the description of which must be very difficult, as indicated, for example, in the lectures Munich, December 4, 1907, and Dornach, December 30, 1914.

The most decisive clue to the question of the ratio of seven to four, both in relation to the seven mysteries and to their revealers, the masters, is given in the notes from the lecture Berlin, November 1, 1904. According to these notes, the main characteristic of the seven mysteries of life is that they apply to all developmental cycles because they are always repeated “in every round and racial development, also in all other cyclic developments, including the human being. This reference makes it possible to understand why, according to the letter of December 24, 1903 to Günther Wagner, “the fourth of the... seven truths goes back to seven esoteric root truths and that of these partial truths (the fourth considered as a whole) one is delivered to each race, as a rule.”

From this, three things can be deduced:

1. The seven root truths or secrets apply primarily to the great developmental cycles of the planetary chain Saturn-Sun-Moon-Earth-Jupiter-Venus-Vulcan.

2. The fourth secret of birth and death applies to the entire development of the earth.

3. Since the seven mysteries are always repeated, they also apply to all sevenfold subdivisions of the overall development of the earth, but as partial truths of the overarching fourth mystery (see, for example, Dornach, November 3 and 4, 1917).

The question arises: how does Rudolf Steiner's work and activity relate to the seven great mysteries of life?

Rudolf Steiner's work and the fifth of the seven great mysteries of life

Since the seven great mysteries of life apply to all sevenfold developmental cycles, the fifth mystery, that of evil, must become decisive for our immediate present as the fifth post-Atlantic cultural epoch. Not as a whole, but as a partial truth anticipated, for the fourth mystery still applies as the overriding principle for the overall development of the earth. The fifth secret will reveal itself more strongly than it is doing today in the fifth cultural epoch and in its full power at the fifth stage of the earth's life, when the earth will have developed to the fifth planetary stage, the consciousness of Jupiter. (Munich, January 16, 1908).

If it is stated in the letter of December 24, 1903 to Günther Wagner that Theosophy, the partial Theosophy that lies, for example, in Blavatsky's “Secret Doctrine” and its “Esotericism” (the third volume of the “Secret Doctrine”), is a sum of partial truths of the fifth secret, this raises the serious question: What can evil have to do with Theosophy?

This question finds a certain answer in the spiritual-scientific view of good and evil. According to this, the recognition of good and evil in our cultural epoch is bound up with the recognition of the spiritual developmental impulses of the human being and the cosmos. (Dornach, September 28, 1918). Evil occurs when the individual or the community strays from harmony with the progressive impulses of the cosmos. There is no such thing as evil in itself. All evil is not absolutely real, but arises from the fact that something that is good in some way is used in the world in an inappropriate way. This turns a good into an evil. (Munich, August 25, 1913).

Another concept of evil was decisive for the previous cultural epoch, the Greco-Latin period, because it was the fourth epoch under the fourth secret, that of birth and death. This can be seen from the following modification of the seven stages of initiation. The Christian-Gnostic path of initiation, as it was decisive in the fourth epoch, had the seven stages: foot washing, flagellation, crowning with thorns, crucifixion, mystical death, entombment, ascension. The Christian-Rosicrucian path of initiation, which is decisive for the fifth cultural epoch, has the seven stages: Study for True Self-Knowledge, Imagination, Learning Occult Writing or Inspired Knowledge, Rhythmization of Life (Preparation of the Philosopher's Stone), the Correspondence between Microcosm and Macrocosm (Knowledge of the Connection between Man and the World), Dwelling or Immersing Oneself in the Macrocosm, and Divine Bliss. Now, in both paths of initiation, the experience of evil lies on the fifth step, but in the Christian-Gnostic path of the fourth epoch it was connected with the experience of the mystical death as the so-called “descent into hell”. In the path of initiation of our fifth epoch, on the other hand, one gets to know true good as the correspondence between microcosm and macrocosm and evil as the respective deviation from this correspondence on the fifth initiation level. Since the path of initiation that is decisive for an epoch is always connected with the forces that are to be developed in the respective epoch in connection with the seven secrets of life, anthroposophy was bound to become the science of the correspondences or non-correspondences of microcosm and macrocosm. The question of good and evil must therefore be resolved today through the knowledge of the right correspondence.

Seen in this light, the statement in the letter of December 24, 1903, that Theosophy is a sum of partial truths of the fifth secret, can be explained to mean that only the double meaning of the fifth step of the modern path of initiation can be meant: the correspondences of microcosm and macrocosm on the one hand, evil as the aberrations of this on the other. Thus, in the spirit of the fifth epoch, knowledge of good and evil, which in the fourth epoch had a more fixed, more spatial character, takes on a more fluid character. It becomes more and more a question of recognizing the right impulses of time, or, to put it another way, the right impulses of cosmic-historical development. This developmental step from a more spatial to a more temporally shaped knowledge is based on a certain lawfulness, to which Rudolf Steiner once drew attention when he spoke about the relationship of the first four cultural epochs to the three that followed. He said:

“When a spatial relationship is to become temporal, it happens in such a way that it happens in the ratio of four to seven, that the tetrad expands into the heptad... The ratio of four to seven is based on a very specific law.” (Berlin, October 28, 1904)

The fact that a completely different position must be taken to the question of good and evil than had been correct for the preceding epochs, is also expressed in the following entry in a notebook: ¹⁴

"The masters are not a bulwark against evil, but guides to the absorption of evil. We should not exclude evil, but rather take it up and use it in the sphere of good. The lion's rage is evil only as long as it is used selfishly by the lion; if a ruler could appropriate the lion's rage and use it to create welfare institutions, it would be good. Therefore, evil is to be recognized as non-real. There is no evil. Evil is only a displaced good. Only with this realization is spiritual alchemy possible.

In connection with the seven great mysteries of life, it can be said in the sense of H.P. Blavatsky that “each new root race at the beginning of a round must receive its revelation and its revelators.” Rudolf Steiner in his work can only be understood as the first proclaimer of the fifth esoteric root truth, the fifth of the seven great mysteries of life, and in its double meaning: the correspondence between microcosm and macrocosm on the one hand, and the aberrations from it as evil on the other.

In the written records from the early years of his spiritual scientific lectures, the proclamation of the mystery of evil appears only in hints, but already in its full and profound significance. For example, the report of Rudolf Steiner's remarks at the first general assembly of the German Section of the T.S. (Berlin, October 18, 1903) that among the many reasons that led to the founding of the Theosophical Society as an “occultly powerful necessity”, one of the most important is that each human race is given “a secret” and that we, as the fifth race, are at the fifth secret, which, however, cannot be pronounced today. The text continues:

"We are gradually living into it. What kind of secret it is, is already hinted at by Paul, who was an initiate. It will only be revealed in the course of the development of our race. A premature guessing of this secret through purely intellectual abilities would mean an indescribable danger for humanity. Since such a guess has almost been made twice already ¹⁵ and will happen again in the foreseeable future, the great teachers of humanity have brought about the theosophical movement. Humanity is to be prepared for the great truth. Theosophy is working towards a certain point in time. A core is to be formed that understands this truth when it emerges undisguised one day – a core that grasps it correctly and uses it not as a curse but as a blessing for humanity. The earlier races were formed from an already existing one, by selecting suitable individuals or families and continuing them through the Manu in suitable uninhabited landscapes. This procedure is no longer feasible with today's global transportation, but it is also no longer necessary. In its place, education is provided by the cosmopolitan International Theosophical Society, which is to form this core.” (Berlin, 18.10.1903).

If the fifth secret of life was characterized more generally at that time, it was later described in more concrete terms as the unlawful use of the sacred powers of transformation:

"It truly allows us to gain deep insights into the mystery of existence when we know the source of injustice, evil, crime and the misfortunes that befall the world. As a result, the best and most sacred forces that exist, namely the powers of transformation, are applied in the wrong way. There would be no evil in the world if it were not for the most sacred powers of transformation.

More and more urgently and in ever greater detail, Rudolf Steiner spoke of the reign of evil, especially of its reign in history as the aberrations from the progressive evolutionary current, particularly since the outbreak of the First World War. The great significance of the realization that evil is the fundamental mystery of our time also makes it possible to understand why the visible emblem of the Anthroposophical Movement, the Goetheanum, was associated with it. At the laying of the foundation stone (Dornach, September 20, 1913), the Fifth Gospel, the Gospel of Knowledge, was mentioned for the first time, in accordance with an “occult obligation”. The core of this gospel, the macrocosmic Lord's Prayer, reads:

Evil reigns
Witnesses of dissolving egoity
From other selfhood guilt incurred
Experience in daily bread
In which heaven's will does not prevail
Because man separated himself from your kingdom
And forgot your name
You fathers in the heavens.

And in the following ten years of intensive construction work, with the help of many volunteers, the central motif, the sculptural group “The Representative of Humanity between Lucifer and' Ahriman”, was created as an artistic expression of the dual nature of the fifth secret of life. The Representative of Humanity – Christ, as seen by Rudolf Steiner in his recognition as the Master of all Masters – represents the full correspondence between microcosm and macrocosm and overcomes the powers of aberration, of evil: Lucifer and Ahriman, through his radiance of love. When the building, almost completed, was destroyed by fire on New Year's Eve 1922/23, the only thing that remained was this wooden sculpture – a legacy and a memorial from its creator for the realization of the deepest secret of life in our fifth period.

• 1. Autoreferat ‘Occult Historical Research in ’Lucifer-Gnosis,” GA 34.
• 2. Friedrich Rittelmeyer, “My life-encounter with Rudolf Steiner”.
• 3. Concerning space and time in connection with the numbers 7 and 12, see also the lecture in Munich on August 31, 1909.
• 4. Also in the writing “From the Akasha Chronicle”, GA 11, it is implied that there are actually twelve levels of consciousness, but only seven of them can be described. The eye of the seer can see five more, but a description of them is quite impossible.
• 5. As reported by Friedrich Rittelmeyer.
• 6. See, for example, Lecture Berlin, October 25, 1909 in “The Christ Impulse and the Development of I-Consciousness”, GA 116.
• 7. Notebook from 1903, archive number 427 and notepad 580/81.
• 8. Blavatsky, “Secret Doctrine”, I. Volume, German edition, Leipzig, no year, page 73. f
• 9. On the Bodhisattva-Buddha question, see ” The Bodhisattva-Buddha Question, CW 93a; Spiritual Hierarchies and their Reflection in the Physical World, CW 110; The Christ Impulse and the Evolution of I-Consciousness, CW 116; Esoteric Christianity and the Spiritual Guidance of Humanity, CW 130.
• 10. German translation 1897 by the Theosophist Carl Graf zu Leiningen-Billigheim, “Das transzendentale Weltall”. New edition Stuttgart 1990.
• 11. See “The Secrets of the Threshold”, GA 147; “Occult Reading and Occult Hearing”; GA 156; “Spiritual-Scientific Explanations of Goethe's Faust” (3.,4.Nov.1917)GA 273.
• 12. The paper by Schure was originally written in French. In the German translation in GA 94 “Kosmogonie” it says “namenlose” (nameless) instead of “unsagbaren” (innomable), which is a translation error.
• 13. This fourth mystery is only recorded in Schur's presentation as “The Mystery of Death,” which is likely to be a defect in the transcript.
• 14. 1906, archive number 105; cf. in the appendix to the section 'Individually Given Exercises', 5. 188.
• 15. More details are not known.

that initiated the separation from the Esoteric School of Theosophy.

To the members of the German Section of the Theosophical Society

[Berlin, early July 1906] Dear Friends!

The President-Founder of the Theosophical Society sent the following executive note to me as the General Secretary of the German Section and requests me to communicate its contents to the members.

Serious accusations¹ which have been raised by the Executive Committee of the American Section of the Theosophical Society against Mr. C. W. Leadbeater, have caused the President-Founder to call a meeting for May 16 in London, at which were present the entire Executive Committee of the British Section and delegates from the American and French Sections. It was to be discussed with the President what measures should be taken.

After careful consideration of the charges, and after hearing Mr. Leadbeater's verbal explanation, the following resolution was adopted:

Having considered the charges preferred against Mr. C. W. Leadbeater and having heard his defense, the committee unanimously recommends to the President the acceptance of Leadbeater's resignation, which he had already tendered prior to any action of the committee.

Mr. Leadbeater's membership of the Theosophical Society thus ceases, as does his mandate as a presidential delegate.

H. S. Olcott P.T.S.

Dear Friends!

The above document contains an important message in a somewhat brief form for the members of the Theosophical Society. Mr. Leadbeater is not only a member of the Society; he is one of the most outstanding propagators of the Theosophical worldview. His books have become a guide to Theosophy and a guide within it for many. He has numerous disciples who follow his direction. He has just completed a long lecture tour, during which he achieved something significant for the Theosophical movement in America and Australia. And immediately afterwards, “serious accusations” were made by the American section, the section within which he had just been working so energetically.

In view of these circumstances, I must concede to the members of the German section the right to demand an explanation from me as General Secretary. It is indeed repeatedly emphasized from many sides that the Theosophical Society in its aims and tasks should not be confused with the achievements of some of its members. On the other hand, however, it cannot be denied that the Society's overall activity is composed of the work of its individual members, and that it cannot be unimportant if trust in outstanding work must suffer a severe shock due to facts of the kind communicated in the President's circular. For with this trust in the workers, surely that in their achievements also falls away. And these achievements form the true living content of the Society. They are the means by which the Society is to fulfill a great task, from which its members want to draw spiritual nourishment. The Society certainly cannot live by the ever-recurring enumeration of the “three basic goals,” which are supposed to stand higher than any achievement of individuals.

But there are reasons for not talking in a circular about the things about which some of our American members have made serious accusations against Mr. Leadbeater, and because of which the members of the Executive Committee of the British Section and some delegates of the French and American Sections felt obliged to give their consent to the acceptance of Mr. Leadbeater's resignation.

I myself can now speak all the more impartially about this case of Leadbeater's, because from the standpoint of occultism, which I have to represent, I have always had to reject the methods by which Mr. Leadbeater comes to his occult realizations and which he also recommends as useful methods for others. I am not saying anything for or against the correctness of what Leadbeater presents as occult truths in his books. It is the case in occultism that someone can come to some correct insights, even though the methods he uses are dangerous and can easily lead astray. I must therefore trace the case of Leadbeater back to much deeper underlying causes. At the same time, however, I must explain that there is almost no one for whom there is no guarantee of falling into a disastrous error if he applies the methods on which Leadbeater's work is based. Because of my point of view, the case of Leadbeater was no surprise to me. But I do not think that anyone who agrees with the methodological basis of Leadbeater's occult research has any reason to condemn him now. Either the circular sent to the members should have clearly stated that the accusations concern matters that have nothing at all to do with occultism, or else Leadbeater's entire occult system falls with him. I am quite clear about the latter; that is why I have explained my point of view to the members of the German Section here, instead of making an official statement that is not included in the executive note.

As for the assessment of Mr. Leadbeater as a person, which might be important to some, it may be stated that he always emphasized the good intention he had in all of this, of which he is accused. And no one has any reasonable grounds for casting doubt on this assertion of Leadbeater's. It should also be considered in this matter that a large number of American members of the Theosophical Society have just sent out a circular letter in which they vigorously protest against the action taken against Mr. Leadbeater and in which they strongly demand his reinstatement in all his rights. From this it could also be concluded that one can have a different opinion about the charges against Leadbeater than the American Executive Committee has, and than those who simply make the opinion of this committee theirs.

I ask the esteemed members of the German Section not to be shaken in their commitment to the Theosophical cause, whatever the consequences of the Leadbeater case may be; and with that I send all friends

heartfelt Theosophical greetings

Dr. Rudolf Steiner
General Secretary of the German Section

I am happy to provide any member with further oral clarification of the matter should the opportunity arise.

• 1. Regarding the accusations against Leadbeater, see Gregory Tillet's biography “The Elder Brother”, London 1982.

that initiated the separation from the Esoteric School of Theosophy.

To Annie Besant, early July 1906 ¹

Dear Mrs. Besant.

I have received your messages dated June 9, 1906, from Simla, India, to the Wardens and Sub-Wardens of the E.S. Thank you very much indeed. Please allow me to write the following in response. Since you have granted me complete freedom in conducting E.S. affairs in Germany, I have so far not wished to take up your valuable time with letters; but the present case of Leadbeater is important enough to justify this letter. I would like to point out in advance that I am having my letter translated by Marie von Sivers to make it easier for you to read. This is certainly not a mistake, in my opinion, because this colleague of mine can no longer be misled by what I have to say; and as for the very last things I have to say, I will not say them in full. I think you will read them between the lines.

Now a word in advance. I will speak with complete frankness. And with this in mind, I ask you, dear Mrs. Besant, to include the following.

I was not surprised for a moment by what was said against Mr. Leadbeater. And neither what Messrs. Mead and Keightley were able to tell me in Paris, who were present at the meeting of the Executive Committee, nor the report sent to the General Secretaries from that meeting, were able to change my opinion – ultimately – from what it was before this whole matter became publicly known to a limited extent.

The whole matter presents itself to me in a much deeper light and context. I have to see the bad in the whole thing in the peculiarity of Mr. Leadbeater's occult method. This occult method must necessarily lead in certain cases to such or similar errors as those found in Mr. Leadbeater, because it is no longer applicable to the cycle of humanity to which the Western population belongs. It does not have to be the same errors in every case, but similar ones may arise that are no less serious. For these methods can lead to a sure result only when behind each one who enters the path stands the absolute authority of a guru, such as is quite impossible in the Occident because of the general cultural conditions. In the Occident, a person may be led to the stage of psychic development on which Leadbeater stood only if the part of the guidance that can no longer come from the guru is replaced by a certain degree of mental training. And this training is lacking in Mr. Leadbeater. By this I do not mean a mere intellectual-philosophical training, but the development of that level of consciousness that consists in inner, mental vision. This simply requires the level of brain development that the Westerner must have attained. In Germany, for example, the paths to this training must be taken from the thought mysticism of Fichte, Schelling and Hegel, which cannot be understood at all in view of their truly occult basis.

All this is the case because the thought itself is the same for all plans. Wherever thought is developed, whether on the physical or on a higher plane, it will be a sure guide for everything if it is free from sensuality and grasped in self-knowledge. If it is first developed on the physical plane, according to the Western brain disposition, then it remains the sure guiding thread through all stages of physical and superphysical knowledge. If it is lacking, then the Westerner is rudderless, whether he is moving on the physical or a higher plane. And with the close relationship at the present time between all higher human forces and the forces that belong to a lower level of the sexual sphere, a derailment similar to that of Mr. Leadbeater can occur at any moment. His “case” is not the only one, but something that belongs to the field that is currently being practiced in many occult groups that are more or less heading in the wrong direction. The Masters of the Rosicrucian School have foreseen the peculiarity of the fifth human sub-race and have worked out the “Path” for the Occident, which alone is applicable in the present cycle. As far as it may be brought before the public, this “path” has been communicated by me in the magazine Lucifer-Gnosis.³

It is not necessary to reflect on the individual case of Mr. Leadbeater, but on the dangers of his method. This danger lies in itself; and one should never assume that it cannot lead to such aberrations. What is not right does not begin with the fact that one or another person is led to do the things that have been mentioned here, but already with the way in which one arrives at the results in the sense of this method, as they can be found in Mr. Leadbeater's writings.

If I had stood alone, I would never have recommended Mr. Leadbeater's writings as suitable Theosophical reading. Since I joined the T.S. for deeper reasons, I naturally could not reject the books of a recognized leader.

So that is the merits of the case. But the treatment he has received at the hands of the British Section Committee is, in the occult sense, quite impossible. How can it not be clear that by such a judgment one has done something equivalent to the act of a man sawing off the branch on which he sits?

The difficulty lies in the fact that the exoteric character of T.S. must always collide with the occult point of view when it comes to an emergency arising from the occult worlds. It would have to be ensured under all circumstances that Mr. Leadbeater is not morally condemned in the ordinary sense, that everyone who hears about the matter also learns that this is a case that can only be understood by the occultist, and that Leadbeater has not “morally failed” in the ordinary sense of the word , but that he fell a victim to his method, that what the public morally condemns here is to be judged according to the principle that “where there is strong light, there must also be strong shadow”. Only through such an interpretation can one get over the shock into which, in the other case, society will inevitably fall.

It will not depend on our judgment of Mr. Leadbeater, whom so many now condemn, but solely on our finding the right way to continue our work fruitfully. And that can only consist in recognizing the Rosicrucian path as the right one for European conditions. If we do not do this, cases similar to Leadbeater's will be repeated, and the Society will disintegrate into its atoms. In the present phase of human development, occultism must be taught publicly, of course with all the restrictions that the holy masters impose on us; but in this teaching, too, we must take a truly occult point of view. It would be contrary to the demands of our time if we were to limit ourselves to a mere operation of things that can be controlled by the so-called “common sense”. This word “common sense” played a fateful role at the Paris Congress.

I do not wish to bother you further, dear Mrs. Besant, with specific suggestions regarding what needs to be done in Germany for the good of our great cause, because it is only possible if I have the full freedom I have been granted in this case as well. In Central Europe, the lines of occult activity have been clearly defined since the fourteenth century; and we must follow these directions here. Those in Germany who are still walking in the paths that were taken here before our section was founded have often said to me during my lectures: “Yes, but Leadbeater says otherwise...”. But it was always foreigners who had come to Germany on a visit who said this. I knew that I had to say something different.

In conclusion, I need only say that I am aware of my devotion to the masters in every word of this letter, and therefore I can also know that you, dear Mrs. Besant, will not see my candour in the wrong light.

With all my devotion and affection,

Yours sincerely,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner

• 1. Text based on the handwritten draft, for translation into English by Marie von Sivers. A. Besant does not appear to have replied to this letter; at least, there is no reply among her letters, a fairly complete set of which are preserved in the archive.
• 3. Refers to the essays “How to Know Higher Worlds?” which were first published in book form in 1909.

Regarding the election of Annie Besant, head of the Esoteric School, as president of the Theosophical Society, which led to the separation of the Esoteric School.

With the expression of the utmost respect, the undersigned, in his capacity as Secretary General of the German Section and as a member of the General Council of the Theosophical Society, would like to make the following comments regarding the January 1907 messages from the President-Founder and the resolutions of part of the General Council, as well as the letters from Mrs. Besant.

1. It seems completely impossible to designate a member as unsuitable for the Society because he holds this or that opinion and draws the consequences of his opinion in his teaching methods. The Society can only be an administrative body, in accordance with its present constitution; and it cannot form a tribunal of judges to decide whether any opinion is right or wrong. This principle could only be abandoned if members were obliged, upon admission, to hold certain opinions. But that would not be in the spirit of the Society.

2. In the case of Mr. Jinarajadasa, apart from any misunderstanding, there is nothing to justify his exclusion. His exclusion would be legal only if it were admitted that a member could be excluded because he does not hold the opinion held by another section of the Society. Therefore the exclusion of Mr. Jinarajadasa should be annulled. If it is not, it would be a failure to observe the above point 1). The undersigned therefore fully agrees that Mr. Jinarajadasa should continue to be considered a member of the Society.

3. The undersigned welcomes with complete satisfaction the nomination of Mrs. Besant as successor to the esteemed President-Founder. He only adds that the individuality of the esteemed President may continue to dwell in the physical body for a long time to come. He therefore sends his best wishes and thoughts for the President's recovery.

4. The undersigned, in his capacity as General Secretary of the German Section, cannot take any notice of the announcement that Mrs. Besant's nomination was made on behalf of the High Masters. However important the manifestation of the High Masters may be for the esotericist, the administration of the Theosophical Society is not concerned with it. And the latter has to regard Mrs. Besant's nomination merely as an expression of the will of the President-Founder. Whether the President-Founder is advised by the high masters or by someone else is a purely private matter for the President-Founder himself in the exoteric Society. The undersigned is therefore not in a position to officially communicate this justification of Mrs. Besant's nomination to his section. He can only treat this as an esoteric matter. On the other hand, he will strongly support the nomination of Mrs. Besant as President as the will of the President of the German Section, and he does not doubt for a moment that Mrs. Besant's great universal admiration will ensure her almost unanimous election by the German Section. The wishes and thoughts of the undersigned will accompany Mrs. Besant as president at every step, just as they have done in her work so far.

With the most respectful and theosophical greetings,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner
Secretary General of the German Section

Regarding the election of Annie Besant, head of the Esoteric School, as president of the Theosophical Society, which led to the separation of the Esoteric School.

Budapest, February 25, 1907

... I just wanted to add the following lines to the letter to the General Secretaries on a separate sheet: “The undersigned General Secretary of the German Section of the T. S. [Theosophical Society] has answered the letters of the General Council, the President-Founder and Mrs. Besant from January 1907 in the following enclosed manner. He takes the liberty of sending this reply as his opinion on the matters in question to the General Secretaries as well. With theosophical greetings, Dr. Rudolf Steiner.” This is how things can still be handled today. Only the passage regarding Olcott's survival must simply be left out. However things turn out, it will be disastrous for the T.S., but not unfavorably for the spiritual movement. Even the decline of the T.S. as such must not frighten us. You must understand that I myself must remain vague with you about the master affair in Adyar. But you will admit that it takes more than “blindness” to think that an administrative action of the Society can be enforced by appealing to the masters. Mrs. Besant will probably do nothing worse in her present situation than to make this appeal to her own impulses. She will thereby put precisely those who count themselves among her in a difficult position. For if we choose her, we will have to choose her for reasons that are not her own. Can there be anything more absurd? One should not misuse the sacred calling of the masters to support a cause that has been compromised by philistinism. For the masters have nothing to do with that “universal philanthropy” which is only the inverted hypocritical robe of the bourgeois egoism of our age. If you turn this selfishness around, nothing comes out of the nuance of shame that it bears on its right side, except the lust for pity and “universal brotherly love” on the left! The masters are dealing with knowledge and not with moral sermons.

You will understand me. Whether it is Sinnett or Olcott, it makes no difference. We must move forward.

Regarding the election of Annie Besant, head of the Esoteric School, as president of the Theosophical Society, which led to the separation of the Esoteric School.

Typewritten text, page 1 and signature missing.

End of February 1907

The President-Founder has been granted the right to make a proposal regarding his successor based on his personal preference. In the meantime, the Vice President is taking over the business and initiating the election process. Everyone can vote for whomever they choose. The President's suggestion is not binding. The election will not begin before May 1. No ballot submitted before May 1 will be valid. During the month of May, all members will elect the new President of the Theosophical Society. Sinnett is the acting Vice President until the election.

I will not make use of what I now want to say, so I will not say anything about it, although it has been mentioned in other sections.

If we had been informed by Olcott that he was proposing Annie Besant, we would all have elected Annie Besant. But Colonel Olcott's proposal arises in connection with psychic phenomena. It has been communicated in a communiqué sent to all the General Secretaries that on the last day of Olcott's life the two Masters appeared to him on his deathbed and expressed their wish that Mrs. Besant should succeed Colonel Olcott.

They would probably excuse me from discussing this matter precisely because I believe I know something about these things. However, I am in the special position of not being able to express myself further on all these matters. We would be in a difficult position if we were to refer to this communiqué. We must therefore treat it as if it did not exist. We must regard it as if it were only Colonel Olcott's personal wish. We will ignore the content of the matter and discuss only the formalities.

We must not care whether Olcott was advised by a Schulze or a Müller or by a Mahatma. It may well be that he was given the advice by a Mahatma. This is an administrative act, and it is true that the Masters do not concern themselves with administrative matters on the physical plane. On the other hand, we would be in a strange position if we opposed the decision of the Masters. So we simply have to write the name we want on the ballot paper. For those who live in the occult life, the Master's word would be absolutely binding. Olcott may have taken advice. That is his business as an esotericist, but not the business of the Society. If we were to regard it as the wish of the Master, we Theosophists would be in a very difficult position. If the Adyar Communiqué were correct, the President would be appointed and we would not need to elect him.

I would like to ask you urgently to do what you can to ensure that this matter is discussed as little as possible or not at all. However, it should be recognized that the German section at least understands that these things do not belong in public, and that if they must be discussed, they are treated like an intimate family matter in society. We can only serve the true, great cause if we not only try to remain silent about this matter, but also if we try to maintain this silence in such a way that the matter does not become public, so that it can never appear in our newspapers. Just think what a shock could be caused to our society if it became known in the world that the Theosophical Society has the President appointed by extrasensory means. This appointment is to be considered as non-existent. This is difficult, because it can be read everywhere and because there is discussion about whether it should be considered valuable or not. The only thing to do is to pay no attention to it. The high teachings of wisdom have nothing to do with the administrative affairs of society. The content is provided by wisdom, the framework for it is to be provided and formed by people.

Not only out of my conscience, but also out of my knowledge, I had to give you this advice: to ignore the communiqué.

Regarding the election of Annie Besant, head of the Esoteric School, as president of the Theosophical Society, which led to the separation of the Esoteric School.

Berlin, March 12, 1907

Dear Friends!

Certain events currently taking place within the Theosophical Society make it necessary for the following lines to be addressed to the members of the German Section. These events have not played a role within the German Section so far, and rightly so. Now, however, they are stirring up a lot of dust within other sections – unfortunately to the detriment of the Society – and it cannot be avoided that the matter will also be brought into our Section from outside and will disturb minds here. This is why this letter is necessary. The relevant events relate to the election of a successor to our dear and revered President-Founder H.S. Olcott. According to the statutes of our Society, the election of a new President could have been the easiest, smoothest thing in the world.

Now it is being made confusing for no good reason.

The statutes state:

The President-Founder, Colonel H.S.Olcott, holds the office of President for Life, and has the right to propose his successor. This proposal is subject to the approval of the Society. The vote shall be taken in the manner provided.

The President is elected for seven years.

Six months before the expiry of the term of office of a president, his successor shall be proposed by the General Council at a meeting to be held by the latter. And the proposal shall be communicated to the general secretaries and the general secretary of the Society. Each general secretary shall collect the votes of his section in accordance with its statutes, and the general secretary shall collect the votes of the other members of the Society. A two-thirds majority of the votes cast is required for election.

From this it can be seen that the founding president was granted special rights that will no longer apply in the future.

We must now vote in the spirit of these rights. That is, the general secretary of a section must inform the members of the proposal made by the president-founder regarding his successor. Furthermore, the general secretary must hand over or send a ballot paper to each member of his section, which the member may fill out at his or her own discretion.

Of course, no member is obliged to follow the president-founder's suggestion, but can put the name they consider most suitable on the ballot paper. The completed ballot paper is then to be returned to the Secretary General.

For the German section, everything necessary in terms of the statutes has basically already been done, except for the election itself. And this must be carried out in accordance with the instructions of the Vice-President, who is to perform all the functions of the President until a new President takes office. The current Vice-President is Mr. Sinnett. The election will now be carried out in our section in the proper manner at the proper time.

So far, then, everything is in perfect order.

But disorder is brought into the matter by the following.

Before his passing away, our revered President-Founder sent to the General Secretaries and to others all kinds of circulars in which he announced that he had received instructions from higher worlds to appoint a certain personality, namely Mrs. Besant, as his successor.

The President-Founder claims that certain Masters, who in Theosophical circles are referred to by the names M. and K.H., appeared to him and gave him the aforementioned instructions.

Whether or not these instructions are genuine is a matter for esoteric study. It would have been necessary to completely ignore this matter in the administration. For who advises Olcott in his proposal regarding his successor is nobody's business but his own. It does not matter whether Olcott took advice from an ordinary person or from a supernatural power.

One can be of the opinion that Olcott should not have communicated the whole matter. But this communication can be attributed to a weakness of his last seriously ill times. It is also due to this weakness that he said, contrary to the statutes, that he was appointing his successor. Because the statutes give him no right of appointment, but only a right of proposal.

It would therefore have been right to extract the right thing from Olcott's circular and ignore everything else.

This has not been done in various sections.

There is a lot of discussion about what does not belong to the election matter. This carries the risk that a purely administrative matter will be mixed up with esoteric matters. Particularly if one takes the correct esoteric standpoint, that our teachings go back to supersensible sources, then one should carefully avoid bringing a purely social matter, such as the election of a president, into any connection with supersensible powers. It would contradict all esoteric principles to drag the supersensible into the discussion, which can always arise in the case of a presidential election. It should be expressly emphasized here that it would not actually be necessary in principle to say the following, and that it is only said here to prevent misunderstandings that may be caused by discussions in which the leadership of the German Section is innocent, but which have unfortunately arisen.

None of the individualities that we can recognize in supersensible vision will ever interfere in a matter such as the present presidential election. That would be to bind our will, but these individualities, by the way they stand to us, actually want to free our will so that it can make the right decision in each individual case. Therefore, the currents of spiritual life never come to us from them in such a way that they can interfere with our free choice. I am saying something that goes beyond the powers of the General Secretary, but I must say it as a friend of the members.

The time will come when I will be able to say what the actual position is regarding the pronouncements made by Adyar. It would not be right for me to talk about them now.

I would now like to ask the members, especially in the present time, to carefully distinguish the official messages from the unofficial ones. A completely private message, for example, is the one Mr. Mead has now sent to the branches. It is to be understood as nothing more than Mr. Mead's personal opinion. All official messages can only be sent to the members by the General Secretary of a section. The Deputy President, Mr. Sinnett, will also forward all communications to me, and I will duly forward everything to the members.

This to clarify the situation. I will write again as soon as possible.

With theosophical greetings,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner
Secretary General of the German Section of the Theosophical Society.