The Rudolf Steiner Archive

My dear friends!

Before I come to the subject of our deliberations today, I feel the need to say a word about the great, painful loss that we have experienced in the physical realm in these days. As you know, Mr. von Moltke's soul passed through the gate of death the day before yesterday. The man's outstanding role, the tremendous role he played for his people in the great fateful events of our time, and the significant and profound impulses from the human events that shaped his actions and work, will be the task of others for the time being, will be the task of future history. In our day it is indeed impossible to give a completely exhaustive picture of all the things that concern just these our days. But as I said, with regard to what others and history will say, it is not to be spoken here today, although it is the most heartfelt conviction of the one who speaks to you here that the coming history will have a great deal to say about this man in particular. But some of what is before my mind at this moment may and should be said here, even if it is necessary for me to say one or two words in such a way that they sound more allegorical than in the actual sense, which will only gradually become understandable. This man and his soul stand before my soul as a symbol of our present and the immediate future, born out of the development of our time, truly a symbol of what should and must happen in a very, very real, very true sense of the word.

We emphasize again and again that it is truly not the arbitrary act of this or that person to incorporate what we call spiritual science into the culture of the present and the near future, that this spiritual science is a necessity of the time, that the future will not be able to continue if the substance of this spiritual science does not flow into human development. And here, my dear friends, we have something great and significant that should now come before our eyes as we remember the soul of Mr. von Moltke. In him we had a man, a personality among us, who stood in the very most effective, in the very most outwardly active life of the present, the one that has developed out of the past and in our time has come to one of the very greatest crises that humanity in the course of its conscious history has ' has to go through in the course of its conscious history, a man who led the armies, stood in the middle of the events that form the starting point of our fateful present and future. And at the same time, in him we have a soul, a man, a personality who was all this, and sat here among us seeking knowledge, seeking truth, with the most sacred, most ardent urge for knowledge that only some soul of the present can possess.

That is what should come before our soul. For this makes the personality, who has just passed through the gate of death, a towering historical symbol, in addition to everything else that he is historically. The fact that he was among those who stand at the forefront of outer life, that he served this outer life and yet found the bridge to the spiritual life that is sought through this spiritual science, that is a deeply significant historical symbol; that is what can place the feeling of a wish in our soul, which is not a personal wish but which is born out of the urge of the time, which can place the feeling, the wishing feeling in our soul: May many and more and more who are in his situation do as he did! Therein lies the significant example that you should feel, that you should sense. However little this fact may be spoken of in the outer life, it does not matter, it is best if it is not spoken of at all; but it is a reality, and it is the effects that matter, not what is spoken. This fact is a reality of the spiritual life. For this fact leads us to recognize: This soul had within itself the correct interpretation of the signs of the time. May many follow this soul, who may today be very far in one direction or another from what we call spiritual science.

Therefore it is true that what flows and pulses through this our spiritual scientific current has received from this soul as much as we could give it. And we should keep that in mind, because I have spoken of it here many times. It means that now in our time souls go to the spiritual world that carry within themselves what they have taken in here in spiritual science. When a soul that is still very active in the beyond passes through the gate of death and now finds itself in the bright world, which is to be explained to us through our knowledge when we know it up there, when, in other words, what we are seeking is carried through the gate of death by such a soul, then, through the union it has entered into with such a soul, it is a power in the spiritual world that is deeply significant and effective. And those souls who are here and understand me at this moment will never forget what I meant here at this moment about the significance of the fact that this soul now takes with it into the spiritual world what has flowed through our spiritual science for years, that this becomes power and effectiveness in it.

All this, of course, cannot be there to trivialize the pain we feel over such a loss on the physical plane. Suffering and pain are justified in such cases. But suffering and pain only become great and weighty and effective forces themselves when they are permeated with a rational understanding of what underlies suffering and pain. And so you take what I have said as an expression of the pain at the loss on the physical plane that the German people and humanity have experienced. Once again, my dear friends, let us rise:

Spirit of your soul, effective guardian!
May your wings bring
our soul's imploring love
to thy protecting son of heaven's own sphere.
That, united with thy might
our prayer may help to shine
on the soul that loves and seeks her.¹

• 1. Rudolf Steiner also said this prayer at the beginning of the commemoration.Bind them together with us, who are of a spiritual nature and are inseparable through the physical event of death.

Since we last met here, we have had to mourn the loss of our dear Fräulein Morz&us and other dear friends who have left the physical plane as a result of current events. It is particularly painful not to see Fräulein Motzkus among our dear friends who have been attending our spiritual science events here for so many years. She was a member of our movement from the very beginning. From the first day, from the first meeting in the smallest circle, she was always in our midst as a member who was devoted to the heart of our movement and who went through all the phases and trials of our movement with heartfelt sympathy. Above all, through all the events through which we have had to go, she has retained in the deepest sense of the word an invincible loyalty to our cause, a loyalty by which Miss Motzkus was certainly exemplary for those who truly want to be devoted members of the spiritual science movement. And so we look after this dear, good soul in the worlds of spiritual life, to which she has ascended, by preserving the relationship of loyalty that has been developed and strengthened over many years, by knowing that we are connected to her soul forever.

Recently, Miss Motzkus herself had to mourn the loss of her faithful friend, whom she has now so soon found again in the spiritual world, and she accepted this blow in the sense of how one endures such a blow from the consciousness of a true understanding of the spiritual world. It was admirable with what keen interest Miss Motzkus showed a deep sympathy for the great events of the time until her last days. She repeatedly told me herself that she wanted to live here on the physical plane until these significant events, in the midst of which we now stand, had been decided. Now she will be able to follow these events, in which she took such a warm interest, with a clearer vision and a firmer sense of the development of humanity in her present state.

And so let us all take to heart the need to unite our thoughts and our active powers of the soul with this loyal spirit, this dear and loyal member of our movement, so that we may continue to know ourselves as one with her, even though she will be among us in a different form than before, when she was so exemplary in her connection with us in the physical realm.

The man who was one of the most loyal collaborators of our spiritual movement, whom you could see here in our circle almost every week during the years of the war, we had to say goodbye to him in this physical plane during these days: our dear friend Ferman Joachim. When we approach the event of death, which we experience with the people close to us, imbued with the attitude that arises from what we seek as spiritual scientific knowledge, we ourselves find something of what we are to become with regard to our position and our relationship to the spiritual world. On the one hand, we look back on what the deceased has become for us during the time we were allowed to spend with him, as we were allowed to be his fellow strivers; but at the same time we look forward into the world that has received the soul that was united with us and is to remain united with us, because

Herman Joachim: the name is something that shines forth as a beacon for the personality we have lost to the physical plane, a name that is deeply connected with the artistic development of the 19th century, a name that is associated with the most beautiful expression of aesthetic principles in musical performance. and I need not go into what the name Joachim means for the spiritual development of recent times. But if he who has now passed from the physical plane into the spiritual world had entered our midst with all his incomparable, beautiful, great qualities and with a completely unknown name, those who had the good fortune to meet him and to connect their own endeavors with his would have counted him among those personalities who, through the power of their own value, through the extent and sun-like quality of their own soul, are among the most valuable in their lives here on earth. But it was precisely in what this soul was to other souls in purely human terms that the element in this soul that had worked so magnificently as the purest artistic and spiritual element from the Father had a lasting effect. One would like to say that in every expression of the spirit, in every manifestation of thought, there was on the one hand this artistic element in Herman Joachim, which on the other hand was sustained and carried by genuine, most intense spirituality of will, of feeling, of striving for spiritual knowledge. Just as the father's great intentions prevail here in the blood, so there was something in the spiritual atmosphere of this man that was beautifully introduced by Flerman Grimm — this excellent, this unique representative of the intellectual life of Central Europe — blessing the baptism of Herman Joachim, as he was the godfather of Herman Joachims. And ever since I knew this, it has been a dear thought for me, as you will understand after some of what I have said in this circle about the spiritual influence of the personality of Herman Grimm in modern times. When a dear friend of Herman Grimm died, Herman Grimm wrote down beautiful words; when Walther Robert-Tornow, who was quite unique in his peculiar personal individuality, died, Herman Grimm wrote down: “He leaves the company of the living; he is received into the company of the dead. It is as if one must also inform these dead of who is entering their ranks.” And this feeling that one has when someone dies, that one must also inform the dead about who is entering their ranks, Herman Grimm meant not only with regard to the person about whom he spoke these words, but he meant it in general as a feeling present in the human soul when someone close to us passes from the physical world into the spiritual world. We then look back on what we were allowed to experience symptomatically with the deceased, and consider this as it were like window openings through which we can look into an infinite being; for every human soul individuality is an infinite being, and what we are allowed to experience with it is always as if we were looking through windows into an unlimited realm. But there are moments in human life when several people participate in this human life, in which one is allowed to take a deeper look into a human individuality. Then it is always as if, precisely in such moments, when we are allowed to look into human souls, everything that is a secret of the spiritual world would open up with particular force. In extensive performances that are imbued with feeling, much of what lives in ordinary human life, in the great, the powerful, and the spiritually striving, is then revealed to us.

I would like to recall one such moment, because I feel it is symptomatic for me, but in an objective way, with regard to the essence of the deceased. When he was united with us spiritually in an important moment in Cologne years ago, I was able to see in conversation with him, after not long having known him personally, how this man had connected the innermost part of his soul with that what, as spiritual beings and weaving, permeates the cosmos. If I may say so, he had found the great connection of human soul responsibility to the spiritual and divine powers, which are connected to the wisdom of the world's governance, and which the individual human being finds himself confronted with in a particularly significant moment when he asks himself the question: How do you fit into what presents itself to the soul's eye as the spiritual guidance of the world? How may you think out of your self-awareness, knowing that you yourself are a responsible link in the chain of world spirituality? That he could feel, experience and intuitively recognize such a moment in all its depth, in all, if I may use the word, soul-searching thoroughness, as the representation of man's relationship to the spirituality of the world, that revealed to me then Herman Joachim's soul.

He then went through further hardships. The time when that unutterable disaster, from which we all suffer, befell him, weighed heavily on him after he had lived in France, in Paris, for many years and found a dear life companion there. He had to return to his old profession as a German officer, dutifully, but at the same time, of course, understanding that this dutifulness was connected to his inner being. He has since fulfilled this profession in an important and meaningful position, not only with a loyal sense of duty, but with the most devoted expertise, and in such a way that he was able to work in the highest, truest sense of humanity and in the deepest sense of philanthropy within this profession, for which many of those who benefited from this philanthropic work will keep the most grateful memory. I myself often recall the conversations I was able to have with Herman Joachim during these three years of mourning and human suffering, in which he revealed himself to me as a man who was able to follow current events with comprehensive understanding, who was far from allowing his understanding to be clouded by thoughts of hatred or love on either side, where these thoughts of hate or love would have affected the objective judgment with regard to the events of the time, but who, although he could not, through this understanding view of our time, conceal from himself all the heaviness weighing on us in this time, out of the depths of the spiritual essence of the world, carried his hopes and his confidence in the outcome strongly and powerfully in his breast.

Herman Joachim was one of those who, on the one hand, in a completely objective, rational way, as it should be, absorb spiritual science, but who, on the other hand, do not allow this rationality to detract from their deep spiritual insight, their deep spiritual understanding, their direct devotion to the spirit, so that this spiritual understanding, this direct devotion to the spirit is far from ever leading such a soul to what can be most dangerous for us: fantasy, enthusiasm. Such fantasy, such enthusiasm ultimately arises only from a certain voluptuous egoism. This soul had nothing to do with egoistic mysticism. But all the more so with the great spiritual ideals, with the great, far-reaching ideas of spiritual science.

Herman Joachim was always concerned about what could be done to directly translate spiritual ideals into life in his own place. He, who was a Freemason and had gained deep insights into the essence of Freemasonry and the nature of Masonic associations, had set himself the great idea of actually achieving what can be achieved by spiritually permeating Masonic formalism with the spiritual essence of spiritual science. Everything that Freemasonry had accumulated over the centuries in the way of profound insights, which had become formulaic, one might say crystallized, had been revealed to Herman Joachim to a very special degree through his high position within Freemasonry. But it was precisely in this place where he stood that he found the opportunity to think through what he had found and to penetrate it into the right human context, combining what can only come from the power of spiritual science with the traditional that he was to revive. And when one knows how Herman Joachim worked in this direction in the last years of his life, when one is somewhat familiar with the earnestness of his efforts and the dignity of his thinking in this direction, when one is aware of the strength of his will and the extent of his work in this field, then one also knows what the physical plan has lost with him. On these and other similar occasions, I could not help but think again and again of how an American who was considered one of the most spiritual people in recent times wrote the saying: No man is irreplaceable; when one leaves, another immediately takes his place. — It goes without saying that such Americanism can only speak from the deepest ignorance of true life. For the truth says just the opposite. And the truth, measured against reality, as I mean it now, tells us rather: No man can, in reality, be replaced for all that he was to life. And especially when we see it in such outstanding examples as in this case, then we are deeply penetrated by this truth, because in our case, in the case of Herman Joachim, we are truly shown the human life karma. And this understanding of human life karma, the karmic view of the great questions of fate, is the only thing that allows us to cope when we see such a departure taking place in a relatively early human age and from such a serious, necessary life's work, before our soul's eye.

But there was something else I often had to say to myself during these days when saying goodbye to my dear friend, after I had slowly seen my soul day after day go from the regions where it was to achieve so much to the other regions, where we have to seek it through the power of our spirit, but from which it will help, strengthen and invigorate us. I could not help thinking: All the daring, all the spiritual strength demanded of men by the ideas of karmic necessity, they place themselves before our soul when we experience such a death. We must often say things that can only be said within our spiritual movement, but within our spiritual movement we also give the human soul the great strength that reaches beyond life and death, encompassing both.

Herman Joachims' soul stands before me alive. I saw it alive in the midst of a spiritual task undertaken in the fullest freedom. I see it alive in the midst of grasping this task. Then the death of this soul appears to me as something that it voluntarily assumes, because from another world it can take on the task even more strongly, even more vigorously, even more appropriately to the necessity. And in the face of such events, it could almost become a duty to speak of the necessity of individual death in very specific moments. I know that this cannot be a consolation for all people, a strengthening thought that I express with it. But I also know that there are souls today that can be uplifted by this thought in the face of so much that exists in our time to our deep pain and sorrow; that exists because we see how, within the physical world, within the materialistic currents in which we live embodied in our physical bodies, it becomes so difficult to solve the great, necessary tasks. In this context, there may also be a thought that may gradually become dear to us out of pain and sorrow: that someone may well have chosen death for the physical plan in order to be able to fulfill his task all the more strongly. Let us measure this thought against the pain that our dear friend, the wife of Herman Joachim, must now feel and endure, let us measure the thought against our own pain for our dear, precious friend, and let us try to ennoble our pain by placing it alongside a great thought, such as I have just expressed; a thought that does not need to soften or not paralyze the pain, but can radiate into this pain like something that shines out of the sun of human knowledge itself and teaches us to penetrate human necessities and the necessities of fate. In such a context, such an event really becomes something that can bring us into the right relationship with the spiritual world.

If we strengthen ourselves with such thoughts for the inclinations that we want to develop, the inclinations of our soul forces to the present and future abode of the dear soul, then we will never be able to lose the soul, then we will be actively connected to it. And if we grasp the full force of this thought: a person who was able to love his surroundings like few, who took his death upon himself out of an iron necessity - then this will be a thought worthy of our world view. Let us honor our dear friend in this way, let us remain united with him. May she who has been left behind here as his companion in life know through us that we will be united with her in our thoughts of the dear one, that we want to remain her friends and loved ones.

My dear friends, Herman Joachim's death is basically one in a long line of losses that our society has suffered during these difficult times. I have not spoken about one of the most difficult losses so far because I myself am too involved and have lost too much for the personal connection with the loss to allow me to touch on some aspects of it.

A great number of you here, I think with love, remember our loyal member, our dear member, Dr. Steiner's sister, Olga von Sivers, who we also lost in the last months of the physical plan. Of course, outwardly she was not a personality who could reveal herself in immediate, tangible effects; she was a personality who was modesty through and through. But, my dear friends, if I refrain from describing what for myself and for Dr. Steiner is a painful and irreplaceable loss, I may still point out one thing in this case: Olga von Sivers was one of those of our spiritual comrades-in-arms who, from the very beginning, took to the innermost nerve of our anthroposophically oriented spiritual science with the warmest soul. She took on this anthroposophically oriented spiritual science out of the deepest understanding and the innermost connection of the soul. And Olga von Sivers was such a person that when she took something in, she took it with her whole being. And she was a whole person. Those who were connected to her knew that. She was equally strong in her rejection of everything that now, in a mystical-theosophical way, distorts human progress and leads spiritual life down all kinds of wrong paths. She was strong in the power of distinguishing between that which, as belonging to our time, wants to become part of human progress and work for it, and that which, out of some other impulses and motives, presents itself as theosophical and the like, as all kinds of mystical striving. With regard to the original grasping of the truth for which we strive, Olga von Sivers can be counted among the very greatest of our fellow aspirants. And she, too, was never in the least disposed by her nature to neglect the tasks of her life, of the outer life, of the immediate daily life, the often difficult duties of this immediate daily life, or to evade these duties by fully and undividedly devoting herself to our spiritual movement. And what she, with full understanding, had accepted as the content of our movement from the very beginning, she transferred to others. Wherever she was able to apply our teachings to others, she also fulfilled this task in a truly exemplary manner, applying the power of ideas through the loving, tremendously benevolent nature of her being, in order to have an effect on humanity through these two sides: the power of ideas – and the special way in which her personality conveyed those ideas.

She did this even after those borders separated her from us, borders that today stand so terribly in the way of what often belongs so closely together in human terms. These borders did not prevent her from working for our cause even in the area that is now considered enemy territory in Central Europe. Difficult experiences were on her mind, all the horrors of this terrible war, During which she developed a truly humanitarian activity right up to her last weeks of illness, never thinking of herself, always working for those who had been entrusted to her as a result of the terrible events of this war, developing a Samaritan service in the noblest sense, permeating this Samaritan service with what her whole thinking and striving permeated through our spiritual movement. Although I am close to her, I may share this side of her nature from an agitated soul, this devoted and sacrificial member that Olga von Sivers was probably since the existence of this movement. It was a dear, beautiful thought for Dr. Steiner and for me, that once times other than our sad present times come, we will be able to have this personality close to us again. Here too, an iron necessity has decided otherwise.

In this case too, death is something that enters into our lives when we seek to understand this life spiritually, clarifying and enlightening this life. Certainly, there is much to be objected to in many of the things that prevail in our society, that our society brings to light. But we also have such things to record, have such things before our soul, such things to experience, which, as the most beautiful, the highest, the most meaningful, arise precisely from the power that permeates the anthroposophical movement around us. Today I am allowed to speak to you of such examples. And some of you will probably also remember a member who did not belong to our branch, but whom I may mention today because she also often appeared in this branch in the circle of the sisters, known to many here, our Johanna Arnold, who recently passed from the physical to the spiritual world. Her sister, who was an equally loyal member of our movement, preceded her two years ago. During these days, while working on the brochure, I repeatedly had to deal with the statement that I have no relationship to science, and that even the masses of my followers completely renounce any independent thinking. Now, a personality like Johanna Arnold is the most vivid proof of the tremendous lie that lies in such a statement by a professorial ignoramus. The greatness that lay in the way Johanna Arnold passed over into the spiritual world, but also the inner greatness of her whole soul's devotion to spiritual science, they are truly living proofs of what this spiritual science is taken for by the most valuable people. Johanna Arnold's life was one that imposed trials on the person, but which also strengthened and steeled the person. But it was also one that revealed a great soul. Not only was Johanna Arnold a strong support for her branch and neighboring circles during her time in the Anthroposophical Movement, not only did she have such a beautiful effect in the Rhine area, in connection with many other personalities — one of whom was recently also snatched from us into the spiritual realm: Mrs. Maud Künstler, the unforgettable one, who was so intimately connected with our movement. Not only did Johanna Arnold work in her own way since her connection with the anthroposophical movement, but she also revealed a strong, powerful soul within this movement itself. At the age of seven, she saved the life of her older sister, who was close to drowning, with noble sacrifice and courage. She spent years in England, and the way in which life had affected her shows how life became not only a great teacher and a strengthener of the soul, but also a revealer of everything that life can endure, so that it reveals what the soul longs for after the divine-spiritual. Johanna Arnold's strong and powerful soul made her a benefactress for anthroposophists in her environment, for whom she became a guide; she became a dear friend to us because we could see the strong power that she anchored within our movement. To understand the meaning of this time, to understand what is actually happening to humanity: how often in the last few years, since this terrible time has dawned, did Johanna Arnold ask me this significant question. She was constantly preoccupied with the idea: what does this time of most terrible trial want with the human race, and what can we, each of us individually, do to go through this time of trial in the right way? No event of the day in connection with the great movement of the times passed unnoticed by Johanna Arnold's soul. But she was also able to place everything in the great context, and she knew how to relate everything to the spiritual development of humanity in general. Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, and Robert Hamerling were the subjects of her intense study, to which she devoted herself in order to unravel the secrets of human existence. Oh, there is much that lives within our movement, as we are reminded on such occasions, much that deepens human life, human work, human development. And if anyone is living proof that it is a frivolous lie that within our movement we renounce our own thinking, Johanna Arnold is such living proof and stands, especially through her strength, her devotion, her loyalty to the spiritual scientific movement and also through her will to penetrate into the secrets of humanity through serious scientific work and serious thinking, as an example before those who have come to know her. Personally, I am grateful to all those who expressed this beautifully at the passing away of our friend. And the sister who is here with us today and who has seen both sisters pass away in such a short time, can take with her the knowledge that we, united with her in thought, want to remain loyal to the one who has passed from her side from the physical world to the spiritual world, to whom we not only want to preserve memories but also a living together with her.

My dear friends, even those reflections that are directly related to what touches us so painfully are part of the whole - I may say, stripping away all pedantry from the word - of our living study. In the present time, we also see many things dying that we do not know can experience a spiritual revival in the same way as we say of the human soul. We see many a hope, many an expectation dying. Now one could perhaps say: Why do we, when we look more clearly into the course of human development, have unjustified hopes, unjustified expectations? But hopes and expectations are forces, they are effective forces. We must create them for ourselves. We must not refrain from doing so because we fear that they might not be fulfilled, but we must create them for ourselves because, whether they are fulfilled or not, they have an effect as forces when we foster them, because something comes of them. But we must also find our way when sometimes nothing comes of them.

Before I begin my lecture, I have to report that our dear friend Nelly Lichtenberg has left the physical plane. The younger friends may also know her from her participation in our events, but the older participants know her very well and have certainly taken her deep into their hearts – as has her mother, who is left in mourning.

Nelly Lichtenberg, who had recently sought recovery in Stuttgart, left the physical plane there a few days ago. She and her mother, who was there for her care, have been part of our anthroposophical movement since its beginning. And if I am to express in a few words what, in my eyes, perhaps best characterizes the deceased, who has passed away from the physical plane, and also her mother herself, I would like to say: Their souls were made of pure loyalty to the anthroposophical movement, of pure and deep devotion to the cause. When our movement here in Berlin was still extremely small, we all appreciated the heartfelt loyalty and deep understanding with which they both clung to the movement and participated in its development. Baroness Nelly Lichtenberg carried this loyal soul in a body that caused extraordinary difficulties for her outer life. But this soul actually came to terms with everything in a wonderful spirit of endurance, which combined with a certain inner blessed joy in absorbing the spiritual. And this spirit of endurance, combined with this inner joyfulness, warmed by a confidence in the life of the soul, wherever this soul life may unfold in the future, was also present in the now deceased at her last sickbed in Stuttgart, where I found her in this frame of mind and spiritual state during my last visits. It is clear to you all that anyone who can in any way contribute to a person's recovery must do everything in his power to bring about that recovery. But you also all know how karma works, and how it is sometimes simply impossible to bring about such a recovery. It was, so to speak, quite painful just to see the future when you had the sufferer before you in the last few weeks. But her soul, which was also so extraordinarily hopeful for the spiritual world, led her and those who had to do with her even in the last days. And so one may say that just as her soul departed from the physical plane, so did one here on earth, who had taken up anthroposophy in the true sense of the word, so taken it up that this anthroposophy was not just a theoretical world view, a satisfaction of the intellect or even a slight satisfaction of the feelings, but was the whole content of her life, the certainty of her existence. And it was with this content of her life and with this certainty of her soul existence that she also passed away from this physical plane. It is for us, especially for those of us who have shared so many of the hours here in the physical existence that a person has to spend with her in the same spiritual pursuit, to turn our thoughts to her soul existence. And that is what we want to do faithfully! She shall often find our thoughts united with her thoughts in the continuation of her existence in another region, and she will always be a faithful companion of our spiritual striving, even in her further soul existence. We can be sure of that. And that we promise her this, that we want to powerfully direct our thoughts to her, as a sign of honor, we want to rise from our seats.

that initiated the separation from the Esoteric School of Theosophy.

To Annie Besant, ca. November 1, 1908 ¹

... ² It can be truly distressing that the matter of Mr. Leadbeater, who has rendered such outstanding service to the Society, has caused such strong feelings. This matter is like so much else in the world. It is basically simple at its root; but it has become complicated due to everything that has formed around it as it emerged and especially in the course of the last few years. For me, the matter was never unclear; and my point of view today is the same as when it first arose. My position regarding Mr. Leadbeater has not been shaken in the slightest by the whole affair. The case has been torn out of the sphere of occultism and placed in a field to which it does not belong in principle, in the field of T.S. measures. It is not acceptable to intervene in the sphere of responsibility of an occultist by exoteric means. One could come to disagree with his views and measures. But in the exoteric Society there is no forum that could be called upon to judge it. I myself, for example, would never have allowed a discussion of the matter itself at a general meeting of the German Section, and would have taken part in such a discussion myself only within a purely occult committee. But this is my individual opinion, which has never changed. From the very beginning, I have tried to clarify and calm the situation as much as I could. But I would like to express myself in my official position as Secretary General of the German Section with regard to the current state of the matter. The circumstances of our Section make it quite impossible, especially at this point in time, to follow the example of other sections and address to you, dear Mrs. Besant, as President, a request for the reinstatement of Mr. Leadbeater. When the committee was convened in London two years ago to deal with the matter, the German Section was completely ignored. Of course, I am not saying this because anyone in the German Section would have felt the slightest bit offended; but because the German Section was never in a position to give a judgment on the case. My aim was to prevent the waves that the case had caused from washing up on the German Section. This was completely successful. But now it is quite impossible to engage the German Section for the reinstatement, since it was in no way involved in the departure. Now, of course, there is something essential to be said against this argument, namely, that society is a whole, and that therefore such a matter concerns all members. This would also necessarily come into consideration if Mr. Leadbeater's re-entry depended on a general vote. But that is not the case. Mr. Leadbeater resigned voluntarily and can therefore be re-admitted to any section any day. Naturally the German Section will have no objection to such a readmission.

Since matters stand in our Section, you, dear Mrs. Besant, will appreciate that I had to refrain from discussing the matter at our last General Meeting.

In view of the development of this matter in the English section, the opinion of Mr. van Hook in America may be taken into consideration. May I mention in this regard that you can always count on my loyal support in this matter. Regarding the statement that these or those manifestations go back to spiritual sources, I will always emphasize that no one's right to invoke spiritual sources and to base his work on such sources must not be denied, even though, on the other hand, everyone is free to evaluate such an appeal as he sees fit. I would have to dispute my own right to do many things if, for example, I were to criticize Dr. W. van Hook now. ³...^{4span class="footnoteText">The end of the letter concerns the matter of Hugo Vollrath.}

• 1. Text based on a handwritten draft, for translation into English by Marie von Sivers. Besant responded formally to this on November 23 from Adyar, without, however, addressing the content.
• 2. The previous part reports on Theosophical activities in Germany.
• 3. Dr. Weller van Hook, General Secretary for America, had sent an open letter in May 1908 in defense of Leadbeater, and in a private letter he had stated that the letter had been dictated to him verbatim by a master. Due to the indiscretion of the recipient, this became public knowledge. Outraged, the General Assembly of the English Section appealed to the president, the General Council and the members to end the scandal. A. Besant seized the opportunity and responded on September 7, 1908 with a “Letter to the members of the T.S.” (printed in England in November), in which the matter was turned around: Leadbeater had resigned in 1906 to spare the Society from conflict and to avoid damaging its reputation. Since both have failed and he is an honorable man, he must be asked to rejoin the Society. This is the only way to put an end to the disputes.

regarding the fundamentals of esoteric schooling ¹

Dear Mrs. Langen!

Only today can I answer your letter. ² However, the answer could only be given orally in full; but I would like to send you a few comments in writing first, so that you can see whether it is currently practical and desirable for you to make the journey to Hannover.

The way in which Theosophy has to be spread in our time only too easily gives rise to misunderstandings about its foundations, for example about occultism and its training. One such misunderstanding, for example, is that Theosophy must urge every person who accepts it in any form to undergo occult training. But that is absolutely not the case. Occult truths can only be discovered by those who have undergone occult training; they can be understood by the most ordinary human intellect. And they can be applied in life on the basis of such an understanding acquired by the ordinary powers of the soul. I myself will never publicly teach anything that, though found by occult means, could not be grasped by the ordinary powers of the soul if one only chose to apply them. Theosophy is necessary for our age; and humanity would have to fall into absolute desolation and universal infertility at the present point in its development if Theosophy did not flow to it as a mighty stream of power. However, it would be a bad thing if every Theosophist also wanted to become an occult disciple. That would be – forgive the trivial comparison – just as if, because all people need clothes, everyone had to become a tailor. All people need Theosophy under certain conditions; esoteric training, few.

On the other hand, however, no one can be denied this training if they are suited to it. For however many may seek it, there will not be too many of them for the time being. So in a sense, nothing stands in the way of anyone's occult training. Since many people today are seeking this training under such circumstances, misunderstandings cannot be avoided even among students. Today everyone thinks that what is good for him must also be good for others. Thus general opinions about the training are formed which are basically as incorrect as possible. The occult teacher is naturally obliged to say that the path taken by a person who is more austere in sexual matters is different from that taken by a person who does not shirk the task of serving humanity in this respect. Whatever the occult teacher says in this direction is soon reinterpreted: asceticism is a condition of occult development. In fact, something quite different is true. Asceticism in the sexual relationship facilitates the occult path, makes it more comfortable in a certain respect. Thus, anyone who, out of pure egoism of knowledge, wants above all to “see” can promise himself that he will soon reach a certain goal through a certain asceticism in this direction. But there can be no obligation to such asceticism, only an entitlement that one must first acquire. It consists solely in the possibility of giving mankind a full substitution if one withdraws from the otherwise existing obligation to give the opportunity to embody souls. So you see that asceticism in this direction must not be a rule, but can only be granted to some occultists under certain conditions.

In any case, if you approach occultism with these prerequisites in mind, you will easily understand that any kind of selfishness, even if it is the most hidden and masked, will not get you far in occult training. Of course, a woman who does not shirk her feminine duties will soon make more progress than one who, regardless of the fate of humanity, strives for “knowledge” in basically selfish renunciation, provided she does the right thing.

This probably answers a large part of the questions in your letter. No one can be distracted from their life's work in occult training if they are not going the wrong way. Of course, you can find many so-called “students” who are unsuitable for useful work. But one forms a false judgment when one compares these “students” with those who, without wanting to know anything about Theosophy, are solving their life's tasks. One should not compare the former with the latter, but ask oneself: How useless would these first be without Theosophy? And regarding the second, the right question would be: How would the content of their work be enhanced if they could incorporate Theosophy, or even schooling, into their lives?

I could not recommend that you “practice” without guidance either. I would not like to persuade anyone to entrust themselves to the “training”. It must be each person's own free decision.

The processes of your inner and outer life push you towards this training. With the help of the training you will certainly be able to solve your life's tasks more easily and more surely. Your husband has a much harder time with Theosophy than you do. Only someone who knows that a scholarly education today piles up almost insurmountable inner obstacles to the theosophical truths can judge that. And on the other hand, perhaps nothing is as suitable for overcoming these obstacles as a practical occupation, as it is currently opening up for your husband.

Your training will only be the right one if it takes nothing away from you and adds a great deal to what you already have: health, the strength to live, the security to work and the inner peace that a person needs not for themselves but for their fellow human beings. No work serves humanity that does not arise from inner peace. Every work that arises from an inwardly unsatisfied soul destroys the healthy development of humanity, wherever it takes place.

If you want to try it, after these remarks, I will offer you every possible support. I will be in Hanover from September 21 in the evening until October 4. If you would like to announce your presence there by card, I will arrange everything for a thorough discussion. Address: Dr. Rudolf Steiner, currently in Hanover, Ferdinandstraße 11 at Fleissner.

Give your dear husband my warmest regards and accept warm greetings from

Dr. Rudolf Steiner

• 1. The letter of September 20, 1907 was placed at the beginning because it contains fundamental information about esoteric training. Then, in chronological order, follow the letters that Rudolf Steiner wrote as an esoteric teacher, insofar as they have been preserved and are known. The letters to Mathilde Scholl were provided by the Goetheanum.
  The times given in the letters for the beginning of meditation are related to the phases of the moon. 1
• 2. This letter is not available.

On February 11, 1903, Mathilde Scholl had written to Rudolf Steiner:

...In connection with our conversation, I would now like to ask the following. On plate XXVI of Leadbeater's book [“Man visible & invisible”] is the aura of one of Buddha's disciples, a disciple who has reached the fourth stage on the path, the stage of an arhat. The aura is concentrically arranged, the color sequence from the center:

1) yellow = intelligence
2) pink = love
3) light blue = devotion
4) green = compassion (sympathy)
5) violet = spirituality

all this surrounded by a rainbow-colored or rather mother-of-pearl-colored halo and permeated by living rays of light emanating from the body of the Arhat. - Leadbeater says that the order of the colors can be used to identify the type of Arhat or Master.

To which species or hierarchy could a being belong whose aura, starting from the center, first shows 1) light blue = devotion and then 2) pink = love. The arrangement is also concentric, just like the aura shown - but no colors other than light blue and pink were visible. [In a dream experience.] However, the physical body appeared only in outline and transparent, not three-dimensional, and in it appeared centers (like the swastika or like wheels) that turned in the fastest motion around themselves and emitted light. The face had the features and expression of Master M.

If you can or may tell me who this being is or how I can find an explanation myself, I would be happy.

Should a merger of the E.S. in Germany be possible at a later date, I would be delighted. Some external things are still of help to me. For example, I would love to have proper instructions for my studies. At the beginning, that is, two and a half years ago, the instruction was given as to which verses I should memorize each evening. But since no further instructions were given, I went through the Bhagavad Gita in this way and then the “Voice of Silence,” which I have now reached at the end of the second book. It would be a help for me not to study without guidance and to know, for example, in the morning during meditation that many are focusing their thoughts on the same thing as me – to know that others are studying the same book as me, and many other things.

Rudolf Steiner replied as follows:

Dearest Miss Scholl!

I should have written to you long ago. However, my obligations regarding “Lucifer” ¹ had a somewhat oppressive effect on everything else. Now it will finally come out in a few days; and then I will hopefully also get down to quite regular work. In any case, I will not wait so long to answer in the future as has unfortunately been the case up to now.

First, let me address your main question. The aura you describe is not clear enough for me to be able to say anything substantial about it. You say nothing about rays emanating from the being described. Now, in a more advanced human being, rays are always present in the causal body. These rays are namely the expression of the active forces that the person inflicts on his advancing karma. It seems that what you describe is not a causal body image. However, I do not want to say that we are not dealing with a highly developed being in your case. But then it could only be the projection of the causal body in mental matter. And in this case, I do not understand the swastikas, which again point to an astral element. I therefore request that you write to me with more details about this matter. I would like us to be clear about this.²

It would be quite nice if the newer members of the E.S. in Germany would in some way join together more closely. We need this in Germany in particular. For the E.S. must become the soul of the Theosophical Society. In Germany it must do so even more so because for a long time to come we can only hope for deeper, inner cooperation among individuals, and larger circles will only join externally. But the individuals will form a more loyal, secure and powerful base. And we need that, because we have come so far astray.

In Weimar, everything went quite well. We now also have a lodge there. The lectures were extremely well attended. I would like to come to Cologne for a variety of reasons, to give a lecture there as well. Please, maybe you can prepare the ground there a little. Much, very much depends on us creating new centers. Up to now almost all German Theosophists have sought a connection with the English mother movement that was much too loose. And only from this, in the most intimate connection with it, must we now work. There was too much of a tendency towards dogmatics in Germany, towards the mere intellectual grasp of doctrines, while there is no real understanding of living spirituality. Only when we awaken this latter, when we open our eyes to the fact that for the progress of the theosophical current it is not enough to learn the dogmas (Hartmann), but to belong spiritually to the central individualities from whom wisdom originates and in whom it has its continuous source: - only then can we move forward. We must make it clear, not through words but through imponderables, that it is a matter of the continuous fertilization of the bearers of the T.S. by central individualities. Only those who work esoterically will fully understand all these things; but for that, they must also stand together in a clearly conscious and forceful way, awakening the others.

It was deeply satisfying for me to be able to spend a few hours with you in Düsseldorf. It is the kind of satisfaction we feel when we see others on the road where the mile markers always point forward. For the Theosophist, there is only one gate through which one should pass only once, and which one should not enter a second time, to go back.

In Germany, we have only four or five very secure personalities. And that is why we have to work intensively. If we do that, we will find the ways and means to move forward. If we do not find these ways and means in Germany, then we would be neglecting something now that cannot be remedied so quickly.

My next exoteric task is to spread the teaching as much as I can. I hope, my dearest and most esteemed Miss Scholl, that you are settling in well in Cologne and are able to work there for our cause and to your satisfaction. How are the people in your care?

Hoping to hear from you soon, I remain sincerely yours

Rudolf Steiner

• 1. The journal founded and edited by R. Steiner. See GA 34.
• 2. In response, Mathilde Scholl wrote the following on May 7, 1903: “...Thank you very much for answering my question. The vision I described to you did indeed radiate light, and this light seemed to bubble up from the swastikas located on the head and upper body. In fact, only the head and upper body were visible, and only in outline. The being did not appear corporeal, but seemed to be only a luminous apparition. But the impression was so strong that I believed in the dream that I threw myself at the feet of this being and lost consciousness. Upon awakening, everything was vividly before my eyes and I felt the inner emotion for a long time afterwards. At first I did not look for an explanation at all. It was only through Leadbeater's book that I understood how it is possible to see such an arrangement of colors. But I would like to know who this being was, because even if it seemed to have the features of Master M., it may just as well have been based on my individual mood as on reality.” [The answer to this question is not known.]

Günther Wagner had written to Rudolf Steiner on 14 November 1903:

Dear Doctor,

I am sending you the manuscript of Leadbeater's article “Our Behavior Towards Children” by the same mail, which you asked for when I was in Berlin, to print it in “Lucifer”. ¹

It was a great pleasure to meet you at the annual conference, and I hope that we will continue to work together and support each other for many years to come.

I would be grateful if you could give me some specific information: the hint about a mystery that every race has to solve was completely new to me; I did not find anything about it in “Secret Doctrine”. Would you be able to tell me the four mysteries that the first four races (apparently) solved? I would also like to read H. P. B.'s suggestion about this, perhaps you could give me the exact place.²

In the meantime, yours sincerely,

Günther Wagner

Rudolf Steiner replied as follows:

Strictly confidential!

Dear Mr. Wagner!

Page 73 of the (German edition) “Secret Doctrine” reads with reference to verse I, 6 (Dzyan): “Of the seven truths or revelations, only four are given to us, since we are still in the fourth round.” When you were in Berlin, I suggested, in the sense of a certain occult tradition, that the fourth of the seven truths mentioned above goes back to seven esoteric root truths, and that of these seven partial truths (the fourth regarded as a whole) one is delivered to each race as a rule. The fifth will become quite evident when the fifth race has reached its goal of development. Now I would like to answer your question as best I can. At present, the situation is such that the first four partial truths form meditation sentences for the aspirants of the mysteries and that nothing more can be given than these (symbolic) meditation sentences. From them, then, many higher things emerge occultly for the meditator. I therefore set out the four meditation sentences here – translated into German from the symbolic sign language:

I. Sense according to: how the point becomes a sphere and yet remains itself. Have you grasped how the infinite sphere is only a point after all, then come again, for then the infinite will seem finite to you.

II. Sense: how the seed becomes an ear of corn, and then come again, for then you will have grasped how the living lives in number.

III. Sense: how light longs for darkness, heat for cold, how the male longs for the female, then come again, for then you will have grasped what face the great dragon at the threshold will show you.

IV. Sense according to: how to enjoy hospitality in a strange house, then come again, for then you have grasped what is in store for him who sees the sun at midnight.

Now, if the meditation was fruitful, the fifth secret arises from the four. For the time being, let me just say that Theosophy - the partial theosophy that lies, for example, in the “Secret Doctrine” and its esotericism - is a sum of partial truths of the fifth. You will find a hint as to how to go beyond this in the letter from Master K.H. [Kuthumi], quoted by Sinnett, which begins with the following words: “I have every word to read...” In the first (German) edition of Occult World, it can be found on pages 126 and 127.¹

I can only assure you that almost the entire fifth secret is hidden in an occult way in the sentence by K.H. (page 127), “When science has learned how impressions of leaves originally come about on stones...”.

That is all I can say for the time being about your questions. More perhaps in response to further questions.

The four sentences above are what are called living sentences, i.e. they germinate during meditation and sprouts of knowledge grow out of them.

With happy Christmas greetings in faithful union,

Rudolf Steiner

Berlin W, Motzstrasse 17

• 1. Published in No. 7 of December 1903 of the journal “Lucifer”, founded and edited by Rudolf Steiner. Journal for the Life of the Soul and Intellectual Culture - Theosophy.
• 2. The question refers to statements made by Rudolf Steiner at the first general assembly of the German Section in Berlin on October 18, 1903, which Günther Wagner attended. See page 255f. in the appendix to “The Masters of Wisdom and the Harmony of Feelings” (section “Rudolf Steiner's Work and the Fifth of the Seven Great Mysteries of Life”).
• 1. The wording from Occult World by A.P. Sinnett reads: Naturally I wanted to know more about this; was it a process by which thoughts could be expressed more quickly than by the ones we know? And with regard to letters received, were they read by the occult recipient in the usual way, or did he understand the content without this?
  K.H.'s answer was: I have to read every word you write, otherwise I would make a real mess of it. And whether it happens with my physical or my spiritual eye, it takes the same amount of time. The same can be said of my answers; whether I dictate or precipitate them or write them myself, the difference in the time saved is very small. I first have to think them over, then carefully photograph each word, each sentence, in my brain before it can be repeated by precipitation. Just as in photography, the fixing of images on chemically prepared plates, requires a prior arrangement within the focus of the object to be represented – otherwise, as can often be seen in bad photographs, the legs of the seated person are out of proportion to the head, etc. — so too must we first organize our sentences, and imprint on our mind every letter that is to appear on the paper before it can be read. That is all I am allowed to tell you for now. When science has learned more about the secret of lithophyl (or lithobiblion), and how the impressions of leaves originally come about on stones, then it will be possible for me to make the process clearer to you. Above all, you must know and remember one thing: that we only follow nature and copy it exactly in its works.
  Regarding these so-called precipitated master letters, see the editor's preliminary remarks on the separation from the Esoteric School of Theosophy on page 263f. 1

Berlin, December 24, 1903

Dearest Miss Scholl!

Warmest Christmas greetings to you three, ¹ And the news that you will receive the diplomas and the exegesis for “L.a.d.W.” [“Licht auf den Weg” – “Light on the Way”] on Saturday. Please be patient until then.

Kind regards,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner
Berlin W, Motzstrasse 17

• 1. Refers to Mathilde Scholl's friends and housemates, Maud and Eugen Künstler.

Berlin, December 28, 1903

Dearest Fräulein Scholl.

Please find below the beginning of the interpretation of “Light on the Path”.¹ This is intended to provide a way to meditate on the book. I will continue the interpretation for you as soon as possible.

I will send the diplomas at the latest tomorrow. I would like this letter to go out to you immediately. Give my warmest regards to your dear housemates [Künstlers]

Please accept our warmest regards,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner
Berlin W, Motzstrasse 17

• 1. See appendix page 441.